How will they spend it? [828x808 - 84KB] | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (20).

[–] • 4 pts

(edited )

I have no doubt that jesuits and masons and all sorts of other groups are up to bad things, but they aren't the source of the problem. That is jews, none of those groups have the institutional power that jews have. none of those groups absolute obliterate you for calling them out in public like jews do. you don't lose your bank account , your credit cards, your job for talking about masons. talking about jews is the one conspiracy theory you're never allowed to talk about, even among conspiracy circles. oh Illuminati this, mason that but no never EVER say a word about jews or you'll be destroyed by them.

protspergs who refuse to acknowledge that jews are the real problem not catholics (and vice versa) are doing the jews bidding. There is a reason Hitler banned retarded religious infighting in the NSDAP, it's a distraction that helps the kikes win.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

wat My issue isn't an inability to discuss "jews". I do it very regularly. The big difference is I don't call them "jews". Catholics literally are "jewish" though. Their Old Testament is very clearly just copypasta from the Torah. This isn't "Christian" infighting. Catholics aren't "Christian" anyway.

Anyway, yes you do get in all kinds of trouble for talking about groups alternative to "jews". The difference is you don't get killed for talking about "jews". You just get your life destroyed.

parent
link

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

As I understand it, jews and crypto-jews control most of those other organizations. Never knew of anybody being offed for speaking ill of the masons or Shriners or even the mob. But I must agree with you about the jew thing. Call them out and your life will be destroyed.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

As I understand it, jews and crypto-jews control most of those other organizations.

Control them?... No. Not "jews" themselves. The people above them, maybe. "jews" are just another group of enforcers. The reality is "jews" is a very vague name. It's kind of like calling someone "anonymous". The exact same thing that's happened with "Anonymous" happened with "jews". The problem here is "jews" is too ambiguous. Are there groups of "jews" that wear funny hats, infiltrate governments via economics, entertainment, banking, law, etc? Yeah. There sure are. There's also groups of Jesuits and Skull and Bones too. Shriners and their derivatives do the same (usually acting more at local levels). They work in tier systems with the background pseudo-governance system made up of these types of groups. This is why "shadow government" or "deep state" were coined; they describe these systems of secretive organizations. This is what JFK was talking about. The catch is even this system isn't hegemonic. It's like Hollywood in that respect.

The difference, as you've alluded to, between these secret clubs of faggots and "jews" is that "jews" have grown very ambiguous and have a global system of different sects. Freemasons are sort of under the same umbrella, but these days masons and the groups like them are just reacted to with "okay, conspiracy theorist" when mentioned. "jews" are more out in the open and a demographic. A different term is used in their case - "anti-semite". There's a distinct difference here. One group is established, has a sanctioned historical façade which we can have discourse over. These secretive groups (who do regularly infiltrate as well, each other even) don't afford a common parlance because secrecy is so inherent in their practices. "jews" are different here though because they have a developed exoteric structure.

Sure, maybe I was being a bit dramatic before. Maybe you won't get murdered for only just speaking about them, not at first. At first you'll get called a conspiracy theorist or whatever. So, in a comparison here, we see a reaction looking more like not being able to interact with polite society anymore if you become an "anti-semite". The difference is the secret clubs don't have a public-facing structure to point to and say, "nu-uh. look how civil all of us are" and that's mostly because they don't want a public presence.

>As I understand it, jews and crypto-jews control most of those other organizations. Control them?... No. Not "jews" themselves. The people above them, maybe. "jews" are just another group of enforcers. The reality is "jews" is a very vague name. It's kind of like calling someone "anonymous". The exact same thing that's happened with "Anonymous" happened with "jews". The problem here is "jews" is too ambiguous. Are there groups of "jews" that wear funny hats, infiltrate governments via economics, entertainment, banking, law, etc? Yeah. There sure are. There's also groups of Jesuits and Skull and Bones too. Shriners and their derivatives do the same (usually acting more at local levels). They work in tier systems with the background pseudo-governance system made up of these types of groups. This is why "shadow government" or "deep state" were coined; they describe these systems of secretive organizations. This is what JFK was talking about. The catch is even this system isn't hegemonic. It's like Hollywood in that respect. The difference, as you've alluded to, between these secret clubs of faggots and "jews" is that "jews" have grown very ambiguous and have a global system of different sects. Freemasons are sort of under the same umbrella, but these days masons and the groups like them are just reacted to with "okay, conspiracy theorist" when mentioned. "jews" are more out in the open and a demographic. A different term is used in their case - "anti-semite". There's a distinct difference here. One group is established, has a sanctioned historical façade which we can have discourse over. These secretive groups (who do regularly infiltrate as well, each other even) don't afford a common parlance because secrecy is so inherent in their practices. "jews" are different here though because they have a developed exoteric structure. Sure, maybe I was being a bit dramatic before. Maybe you won't get murdered for only just speaking about them, not at first. At first you'll get called a conspiracy theorist or whatever. So, in a comparison here, we see a reaction looking more like not being able to interact with polite society anymore if you become an "anti-semite". The difference is the secret clubs don't have a public-facing structure to point to and say, "nu-uh. look how civil all of us are" and that's mostly because they don't want a public presence.

parent
link