Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.3K

With the preliminary report for the STOLEN ELECTION coming this week (supposedly) from Arizona, the KKKommieKKKrats are trying to create a war situation by allying with the taliban to start a "war" that they can use to make Biden the Fraud technically a "president during wartime" thereby making him "unremovable" and possibly even "unimpeachable".

Change my mind.

With the preliminary report for the STOLEN ELECTION coming this week (supposedly) from Arizona, the KKKommieKKKrats are trying to create a war situation by allying with the taliban to start a "war" that they can use to make Biden the Fraud technically a "president during wartime" thereby making him "unremovable" and possibly even "unimpeachable". Change my mind.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (24).
[–] • 0 pt

They also "can't" force somebody to "wear a mask" or any other "medical device", yet how many people were in masks? They also "can't" force somebody to inject a substance into their bodies without consent, but they're going to try. They also "can't" censor speech by they are. Etc., etc., etc.

You really think that would stop them? It hasn't thus far.

So are you going to explain all the things "they can't do" to them or shall I?

[–] • 0 pt

You implied there was a way to keep Biden in office beyond 4 years because it would be during a war and the KKK and Taliban or whatever the fuck you were saying.

I pointed out that there isn't. Congress can postpone voting day, but not indefinitely, and it would take a new federal law, and even if a new election weren't held in time, the sitting President is out of office on January 20th whether there's a new President elected or not. It passes to the Speaker. And by the way this has never happened, not once in our history of wars, including the one within our own borders.

So no, I won't explain anything else. I've refuted your original post. Is your mind changed?

[–] • 0 pt

You know what else has "never happened"?

A president that was INSTALLED by massive election fraud.

"Congress can postpone voting day, but not indefinitely...", what's the difference between "canceling" and "postponing"? And yes, it can be "indefinitely", it just depends on their definition of "indefinitely", what's the difference if they "postpone" and election for 1 day? Which becomes 1 month. Which becomes 1 year? As long as they "promise" it's "just temporary", people like you will believe them and make assinine comments like you just did about it not being "indefinitely".

Or have you forgotten about "it's just for 2 weeks to flatten the curve", which became 1 year later, which is still going on under the guise of "someday it will end, and go back to normal".

[–] • 0 pt

First, you should just admit you were wrong about your original post.

Second, I'm not some leftist. You don't need to bark about election fraud, or the virus, or pretending men are women.

Lastly, no, it can't be "their" definition of indefinitely. The Constitution spells all of it out, when the voting occurs, when the votes are counted, when they're certified, when they're delivered to Congress. But most importantly, to your original point, the president and vice president are to leave office on January 20th, four years after inauguration. That's it. There's no legal wiggle room. That's what I'm telling you. I am fully aware people can break the law. But that wasn't what your original post was implying, and as stated before, that's all I'm arguing.

I'm done with this now. You're trying to save face, but nobody is watching, and I don't care. Just let it go. Lesson learned.