The issue with accelerationism is the inevitable turmoil it inspires. I don't think it's our place to argue with whoever is capable of upending the corruption over whether or not it's okay to let like 5-10% of the population die (or die nominally) to hold things together. If we want to make a choice like that, we have to position ourselves in very demanding positions, positions that I doubt any of us would fulfill with any term, if we even could get there in the first place.
Each of us is at the mercy of those more competent than ourselves whether we like it or not. You don't have to accept it though. Go ahead and prove how capable you are. Be my guest.
My friend, the system of the world is unsavable. We can struggle all we like, but jews will always find ways to scoop off anything good as the ship sinks. Perhaps you imagine that the titanic is not sinking. Run with that. I'll keep in mind that every empire has fallen at some point and that our global age is teetering.
When the ship sinks, people who had the foresight to create lifeboats out of the deck chairs will be the survivors. But what do I know. And who is John Galt?
Rand was Jewish, first off... so you seem desperately confused.
Anyway, "burn it all down" is not a solution. You don't get to throw a tantrum and break all of the toys, especially not if you're some lowly prole.
You must understand that we've all been dulled through demoralization. If there was no hope, they wouldn't need to convince us to wear muzzles and stay in our homes. They wouldn't keep stealing from us and keep using legal acrobatics to swindle us.
(post is archived)