house which was built in 1969.
This is NOT a historic house in any sense of the word. This "covenant" makes no sense at all. It is clearly illegal and unenforceable. I wonder when the actual contract was created, because it probably was not original to the house.
This is clearly a case of jews creating a problem to offer a solutuon which they need the problem to justify. In this case they are trying to pass some new law, the details of which are conveniently left out.
> house which was built in 1969.
This is NOT a historic house in any sense of the word. This "covenant" makes no sense at all. It is clearly illegal and unenforceable. I wonder when the actual contract was created, because it probably was not original to the house.
This is clearly a case of jews creating a problem to offer a solutuon which they need the problem to justify. In this case they are trying to pass some new law, the details of which are conveniently left out.
Not to mention there are, or were, many houses with a similar clause prior to modern racial integration laws. And those clauses still exist, but are unenforceable, with many nigs owning prior slave houses that include those clauses.
Not to mention there are, or were, many houses with a similar clause prior to modern racial integration laws. And those clauses still exist, but are unenforceable, with many nigs owning prior slave houses that include those clauses.
(post is archived)