WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

458

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

The dumbest part of this story is that anyone would pay 1.8M for the house that is pictured there.

[–] 2 pts

Also you can tell at least the female is a jew who had a nosejob

[–] 2 pts

all homes should have that clause

[–] 1 pt

You can thank your local 60's Jews for them not having such clauses.

[–] 2 pts

That dude looks like he masked up in his car alone as well as knelt for blm.

[–] 0 pt

it is important 'to keep records of the past.'

Unless, of course, you're an oligarch criminal with bought and paid for judges. In which case, erasing the past is much more important.

[–] 0 pt

house which was built in 1969.

This is NOT a historic house in any sense of the word. This "covenant" makes no sense at all. It is clearly illegal and unenforceable. I wonder when the actual contract was created, because it probably was not original to the house.

This is clearly a case of jews creating a problem to offer a solutuon which they need the problem to justify. In this case they are trying to pass some new law, the details of which are conveniently left out.

[–] 0 pt

Not to mention there are, or were, many houses with a similar clause prior to modern racial integration laws. And those clauses still exist, but are unenforceable, with many nigs owning prior slave houses that include those clauses.

[–] 0 pt

The only reason that house can even humor a $2mill price tag is because there's no blacks nearby.

House prices are now decoupled from the size and certainly the quality. Its a factor of how much you want to be away from blacks

[–] 0 pt

Can we get that clause to include no spics as well.