You still fail to see that the obvious does not align with the definition.
In fact it actually contradicts your point.
I can quote you and it’s still a quote from me. I could even say “someone once said” and it’s still a quote. Lack of original source has no bearing on the definition of a quote.
You still fail to see that the obvious does not align with the definition.
In fact it actually contradicts your point.
I can quote you and it’s still a quote from me.
I could even say “someone once said” and it’s still a quote. Lack of original source has no bearing on the definition of a quote.
lol That's exactly what a jew would say.
Appropriation is their favorite hobby. Ask Albert Einstein.
lol That's exactly what a jew would say.
Appropriation is their favorite hobby. Ask Albert Einstein.
Providing facts in English is what a jew does? Seems like the one subverting clear definitions is you.
You can call names, it matters not, my heritage stands on its own.
Not to mention I deleted it since it didn’t fit “your definition”.
Providing facts in English is what a jew does? Seems like the one subverting clear definitions is you.
You can call names, it matters not, my heritage stands on its own.
Not to mention I deleted it since it didn’t fit “your definition”.
You deleted it because you realized you were wrong.
You deleted it because you realized you were wrong.
(post is archived)