Fucking zoomers
Fucking zoomers
The mention of Hitler in my last post seems to have raised the usual issues.
Comment: "The fact that Hitlers' name has such a negative stigma to it, people just don't want to hear it. I used to be the same way until I started doing my own research. If you're not into reading a lot and want it spoon fed, then watch "Europa, the last battle". This documentary was done in a way that was unbiased in my opinion as it doesn't make Hitler out to be a saint but explains his actions to the issues at the time."
It is not necessary to call Hitler a saint or a sinner. First, we must set the Holocaust aside, as it is not possible to discuss it fairly and rationally. The issue is notoriously subject to irrational censorship, with one side of the controversy under threat of legal prosecution in some jurisdictions. But even having set these limits, it remains possible to make a certain distinction regarding the "Hitler" issue without necessarily passing moral judgment.
Here is that distinction: Factually speaking, Hitler was not an enemy of Europe, but was reacting against those whom he regarded as enemies of Europe (Communists and Zionist Banksters). In contrast, Ziobanksters and the shills and whores of their Global Occupation Government, having ripped open the borders of Europe and North America to uncounted millions of Muslims and other nonwhite haters of Western Civilization over the last 60 or 70 years, are rapidly and inarguably destroying Europe.
Formerly, some believed that Ziobanksters were really "friends" of native Europeans. "Look!" said their supporters. "They're sharing their money with us!" (Actually, they were numerically conjuring fake money out of nothing and giving it to friends and relatives who had agreed, on a blanket basis, to help them destroy Europe and North America with it.) But now we can be certain that they were not our friends at all!
In fact, they HATE native Europeans, which follows directly from the fact that they have flooded the Western World with sworn enemies of Europeans...the people now burning it right before our eyes, and who have never hidden their hostility toward the West. That is, the Ziobanksters are in control of the UN, the EU, and truth be told, the USG, and are the sole reason that the borders of these nations are no longer protected. They have all the money, and obviously, the buck stops where all the rest of the money is. The politicians are just their whores.
So there you have it. Hitler: not the enemy of native Europeans. Ziobanksters: Enemies of native Europeans, saddling White non-Jews with hereditary guilt for bankster crimes (slavery, colonialism, usury, oppression, and so on) under cover of ridiculous nonsequiturs like multiculturalism, White privilege, White guilt, and "Diversity is our greatest strength!" Obviously, anyone who can look at France in flames and consider it a confirmation of "Diversity is our greatest strength!" belongs in the booby hatch.
Note that we have not passed moral judgment on Hitler. That would be a can of worms. Many Jewish people hate Hitler, and we don't want to hurt their feelings. All we've done is made an objective observation about Hitler's stated intentions and Hitler's behavior. This is something on which Jews and Christians alike can objectively agree, at least to the extent that we are of sound mind and moral constitution.
My apologies for any confusion.
The mention of Hitler in my last post seems to have raised the usual issues.
Comment: "The fact that Hitlers' name has such a negative stigma to it, people just don't want to hear it. I used to be the same way until I started doing my own research. If you're not into reading a lot and want it spoon fed, then watch "Europa, the last battle". This documentary was done in a way that was unbiased in my opinion as it doesn't make Hitler out to be a saint but explains his actions to the issues at the time."
It is not necessary to call Hitler a saint or a sinner. First, we must set the Holocaust aside, as it is not possible to discuss it fairly and rationally. The issue is notoriously subject to irrational censorship, with one side of the controversy under threat of legal prosecution in some jurisdictions. But even having set these limits, it remains possible to make a certain distinction regarding the "Hitler" issue without necessarily passing moral judgment.
Here is that distinction: Factually speaking, Hitler was not an enemy of Europe, but was reacting against those whom he regarded as enemies of Europe (Communists and Zionist Banksters). In contrast, Ziobanksters and the shills and whores of their Global Occupation Government, having ripped open the borders of Europe and North America to uncounted millions of Muslims and other nonwhite haters of Western Civilization over the last 60 or 70 years, are rapidly and inarguably destroying Europe.
Formerly, some believed that Ziobanksters were really "friends" of native Europeans. "Look!" said their supporters. "They're sharing their money with us!" (Actually, they were numerically conjuring fake money out of nothing and giving it to friends and relatives who had agreed, on a blanket basis, to help them destroy Europe and North America with it.) But now we can be certain that they were not our friends at all!
In fact, they HATE native Europeans, which follows directly from the fact that they have flooded the Western World with sworn enemies of Europeans...the people now burning it right before our eyes, and who have never hidden their hostility toward the West. That is, the Ziobanksters are in control of the UN, the EU, and truth be told, the USG, and are the sole reason that the borders of these nations are no longer protected. They have all the money, and obviously, the buck stops where all the rest of the money is. The politicians are just their whores.
So there you have it. Hitler: not the enemy of native Europeans. Ziobanksters: Enemies of native Europeans, saddling White non-Jews with hereditary guilt for bankster crimes (slavery, colonialism, usury, oppression, and so on) under cover of ridiculous nonsequiturs like multiculturalism, White privilege, White guilt, and "Diversity is our greatest strength!" Obviously, anyone who can look at France in flames and consider it a confirmation of "Diversity is our greatest strength!" belongs in the booby hatch.
Note that we have not passed moral judgment on Hitler. That would be a can of worms. Many Jewish people hate Hitler, and we don't want to hurt their feelings. All we've done is made an objective observation about Hitler's stated intentions and Hitler's behavior. This is something on which Jews and Christians alike can objectively agree, at least to the extent that we are of sound mind and moral constitution.
My apologies for any confusion.
(post is archived)