(((socialism))) [sic: marxism] is not Socialism.
Socialism IS Communism. Just the lite version.
Yeah sort of, at least at the economic level. At ideological level you can have quite a lot of differences, depends on the "socialist" blend...
There's only one economic system, and it's called capitalism. All other alternatives are just different degrees of state intervention in the economy, maximum state intervention giving you communism, and socialism is somewhere around the middle
Tell me you have literally no idea what any of the 3 are without telling me... https://files.catbox.moe/dvp700.jpg
(((anything))) is not Anything... Whatever the thing they turn it into a world of shit for goys, that's a constant
Okay? And to allow jews to control language and their own mind like retprob and others do is alright? jewish "socialism" and communism are not Socialism. Not even remotely, not close. Socialism is nationalistic in nature as a rule. This isn't something that's new and shouldn't be news to you or others. Why would citizens want to help, care about helping, or be willing to help out-group "citizens" in a (((civic nationalist))) [read: marxist] sense? There is no actual reason that isn't controlled by jew lies of propaganda and extremely low information individuals, as listed. The only reason the government would then care about it's citizens is if it cares about it's people. The plural of people has never been inclusive of outgroup and has always been a racial / ethnic / cultural distinction. If the government cares about it's people, then it's Socialist. If the government cares about outgroup, then it's marxist and not remotely socialist.
It's in here, read the whole thing. https://files.catbox.moe/dvp700.jpg
"The masses of workers only want panem et circenses. They have no comprehension of any sort of ideals."
Therein lies the problem. All forms of communism and socialism view the individual as a beehive views the bee. A possession of The State, to do with as it pleases. This outlook enabled the Night of the Long Knives, just as it empowered the Trotsky assassination, just as it was the driving force behind the estimated 65 million victims of various communist regimes. When it comes to the masses, the 'we know what is best for you' mindset ALWAYS comes into play....the we intelligentsia have high-minded ideals while you lowlifes don't, so you will dance to our drummer...or die.
When government fears the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny.
"this demographic dilemma of a collapsing consumer base for the west's credit-based economies..." https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/571814/d6617b80-d9a7-4fab-9d79-3810edb9db7f
As it is, our entire economic system, as in "credit-based economies", is completely flawed, it can't serve the best long term interests of our people, to begin with, it just can't
And on top of that, we have a loyalty/moral integrity problem at the leadership level and not only at that level. No system or society, can survive a prolonged exposure to widespread "corruption", it's just doomed to fail
That being said, regarding economics, you can have a materially prosperous nation without resorting to capitalism internally, look at saudi arabia, look at all those princes and cousins, saudi citizens, who are factually on welfare, they get paid for just being themselves. Look at gaddafi's Lybia, same deal pretty much, massive .gov intervention in the economy, lots of free shits. Is that desirable ultimately? There are downsides...
Now the trick for those systems to work, is that you have to shit goldbars or piss oil every morning, you have to happen to sit on fucktons of valuable natural resources, which the west lacks, for the most part...
(post is archived)