WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

164

Deaf Shark, 2 Nov 2021

Deaf Shark, 2 Nov 2021

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

If I were the judge I would have found him in contempt, barred him from the courtroom, and sent him to spend a week in jail by now.

[–] 1 pt

It seems that the judge is fully aware due tot he video of what happened. He can see through prosecutions case but has to use “law words” and can’t just say stfu you lying Jewish cock sucker. It’s up to the jury. But they’re allowed to watch the fucking news?! Phones except for calls and no tv I thought for large trials I thought. Wtf.

[–] 1 pt

That would've been the appropriate thing to do. Yes.

Troubling that it wasn't done here.

The judge didn't even issue a warning like he's supposed to.

You don't entertain insane arguments about why someone who was possibly killed in self defense should be permitted to be referred to as a "victim".

It's clearly a term that automatically assumes the guilt of the accused before the trial has even begun.

It's so patently absurd that merely fighting the judge on it is contempt.

Yet not even a formal warning was issued.

If I was Rittenhouse, that's a scary thing to notice, this court is not operating as it should.

The silence of his defense is actually not that bad, as they could possibly use this point as a way to get Rittenhouse retried under different circumstances by showing a clear bias.

The court assuming guilt of the accused before tge trial, a clear case of it.

That's a card you want to keep close to your chest.

[–] 0 pt

His defense was already infiltrated by a saboteur who resigned literally hours before the trial began, and wouldn't share the information they gathered with the rest of the defense.