WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K
https://nitter.net/ARKloster/status/1348048015819493376 https://nitter.net/PatriciaRader7/status/1348260161526374401

(post is archived)

There is no "good" in losing. It doesn't matter if their cause was righteous or it aligns with yours. There is only now and what you can do to advance your cause. Don't look to the past and try to glorify the "what if"s. They were losers. But you or your descendants can be the winner if you play the game right.

[–] 0 pt

The people who would seek to create a better world then. If you want to argue the semantics of failure.

[–] [deleted] -1 pt

Everybody is seeking to create a better world for themselves and/or their descendants, even the ones you hate and despise.

[–] 1 pt

Shove your subjective morality up your ass nihilist.

[–] 0 pt

I'm not sure if that's true. Take Angela Merkel as an example. She has no descendants to consider, and importing a bunch of economy crushing free loaders objectively made her life worse. She gained no more power from her policies. One could argue a more prosperous Germany would have also given her more power.

In short, she was motivated by loyalty to a concept. A destructive concept. Assuming your opponents are trying to improve their lives could leave you to underestimate the depravity and irrationality of your opponent. There are plenty of liberals who think humans are a virus and believe all humans including themselves should be eliminated.