![Maybe - Just Maybe, Having the Q-tards Come to Voat Woke Some of Them up to the jewish Problem [585x346 - 33KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/4Muory.png){kind=link}
The people who would seek to create a better world then. If you want to argue the semantics of failure.
Everybody is seeking to create a better world for themselves and/or their descendants, even the ones you hate and despise.
Shove your subjective morality up your ass nihilist.
I have my own agenda to work on and have spent a great amount of time enduring pain and honing my discipline, which nullifies your accusation of being a nihilist.
Go on and believe whatever you want to believe. You have proven yourself to be a useless object.
I'm not sure if that's true. Take Angela Merkel as an example. She has no descendants to consider, and importing a bunch of economy crushing free loaders objectively made her life worse. She gained no more power from her policies. One could argue a more prosperous Germany would have also given her more power.
In short, she was motivated by loyalty to a concept. A destructive concept. Assuming your opponents are trying to improve their lives could leave you to underestimate the depravity and irrationality of your opponent. There are plenty of liberals who think humans are a virus and believe all humans including themselves should be eliminated.
Someone else's definition of a better world doesn't mean your definition of a better world. It could also mean a wholesale destruction of the entire planet like you said. In their mind, they are still actively contributing to making "their world" better.
Also make sure to take note of my use of "and/or".
(post is archived)