Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

411

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog

I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (173).
[–] • 0 pt

so it’s best not to shit it up, but I still find site bans concerning

There's nothing concerning If you check the site logs and see that banned accounts are only hours to a few days old and have around 20 (at most) deleted posts or comments, which means they are spam accounts.

[–] • 0 pt

Not necessarily. I made only 2 or so posts before I was banned by NameFag. It was the day I signed up. I spent most of the time lurking, as soon as I saw Crensch. I only figured it was "safe" from faggotry when I started looking at other subs.

Nope, NameFag's faggotry is alive and well.

Is he hitting people up for nudes here too?

[–] • 0 pt

You are confusing sub ban and site-wide ban.

[–] • 0 pt

No, I'm not confusing anything. I wouldn't be posting here, if I had a "site-wide ban." I got banned from his channel, 'cos he didn't like what I posted, plain and simple. If this truly is a "free speech" site, then he violated the "rules" of the site. Sub or not either the rules apply for everyone, or close up shop, if you're going to say you're a "free speech site."