Slippery slope. If you hate him so much that you're willing to sacrifice the integrity of a free speech platform, maybe you should just get over yourself.
I remember Crensch on voat before he turned into a Qfag. Many of his posts directly led me to the JQ. Maybe he sold his account, maybe he went crazy, who knows. Maybe he's right.
I'm not willing to resort to reddit-tier mob rule to spite someone exercising free speech, even if he is being a faggot and banning people who disagree with him (which only hurts his own stance).
If your intention is to argue his points, then do it in a sub where he can't ban you. Crying to teacher hurts your stance.
I didn't say remove his ability to speak, like he would do to others, only to remove his ability to silence others.
Neither did I. I consider taking away someone's sub out of spite a violation of free speech.
You know exactly what would happen as soon as he loses his ban hammer. People will flood his sub with gloat spam. Out of spite.
Let him handle his sub his own way.
It's not out of spite. People see the posts and disagree with them and go into his sub and post that they disagree and get banned. We can't downvote for fear of being banned, we can't post our disagreements without fear of being banned. Containing our posts where the Q crowd doesn't see our disagreements is useless and gay.
Crensch will also ban people who post in subs he disagrees with. You don't even have to post in his sub.
Free Speech Forum vs Banning people from Free Speech Forum for free speech
Pick one
It's one sub on a forum. Make your own sub to discuss his bullshit.
Let's say you did that.
For whatever reason, Qmers flood the site and decide to piss you off by spamming your sub with pro-Q posts.
Since there is already a dedicated Q sub, you decide this is retarded and start banning the people ruining the sub you made specifically for countering Crensch posts or whatever.
Then all the Qmers take a vote and convince AOU to stop you from banning people coz free speech.
Whose freedom of speech has been pissed on there?
He's just banning people for laughs, doesn't even give a reason. Get real.
I made a sub for that on the other website. Turns out nobody wanted to argue facts, because they couldn't.
This is confusing, you're saying that allowing someone to ban people for any tiny thing they say that they don't agree with is free speech?
Yeah, it's his bakery. If you don't like his rules, don't go there.
Barging in and forcing him to bake your faggot cake is a violation of his free speech. Or something.
You must admit that a discussion forum becomes rather stale when you only allow the opinions you agree with. That's why we all left Reddit, remember?
(post is archived)