It belongs to whom created it, obviously. Why would anything else be the case? If website owners want to allow others to own parts of their platform, then they should be hands off, or don't allow that, or have rules on what owning part of their site entails. I think that the sub owner (posession is 9/10ths law) is free to do whatever the fuck they want, unless the site has rules saying otherwise.
It belongs to whom created it, obviously
The problem with this is that it creates power mods who create vast amounts of territory and use this territory to impose their personal views on a user base. This is what caused so many problems on reddit, and why Voat was so against it, because it can lead to abuse.
Vast amounts of territory. Like white Nations? We can't have that! Send in the niggers!
You are conflating different things, but your argument is valid. I will point out that I’ve watched you dismantle many a power mod over the years, it’s a pity that you changed your stance.
So make rules against it.
Yes, site rules, which is what you oppose in your original argument.
Remember on Reddit how the top 100 subs had the same 6 mods or something? He does have a point that this has the ability to lead to topical control over the majority of the front pages by just a few people
So make rules that disallow this, currently there are none here.
Anarchy servers have issues, ask the Minecraft 2b2t mods.
(post is archived)