WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

912

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog

I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

It belongs to whom created it, obviously

The problem with this is that it creates power mods who create vast amounts of territory and use this territory to impose their personal views on a user base. This is what caused so many problems on reddit, and why Voat was so against it, because it can lead to abuse.

[–] 0 pt

Vast amounts of territory. Like white Nations? We can't have that! Send in the niggers!

[–] 1 pt

You are conflating different things, but your argument is valid. I will point out that I’ve watched you dismantle many a power mod over the years, it’s a pity that you changed your stance.

[–] 0 pt

If you look back at the original intent of protect voat, it was supposed to be only directed at public Subs.

The creator of PV, Scandinavian, said it best, that a forced free speech for all wherever only works in a homogeneous group.

It slowly moved towards the same thing for private Subs and I got caught up in that.

It would be the difference in a power cracking down on international waters versus the power cracking down on who gets into their country.

I very much was wrong to go after the private Subs.

[–] 0 pt

So make rules against it.

[–] 0 pt

Yes, site rules, which is what you oppose in your original argument.