WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.2K

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog

I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

I mean, look at this censorship happy faggot: https://poal.co/s/QStorm/sublog I could understand spam being removed, but this list of bans and removals are legitimate posts.

(post is archived)

[–] 12 pts

Crensch's tactics are what turned voat into a qtard shitsty where low effort normies all became qtard zombies.

If AOU is smart he'll do something about it.

Even on voat and 8chan mods and board owners got stripped if they were banhappy and banning people over simple disagreements.

The old rule of no raids should still apply if crensch can prove a coordinated raid took place he should ban the raiders but if his sub hit front page and then users got blown out for bad opinions and all the top comments were from front page dwellers he needs to just suck it up and take the hit.

Blocking a sub is a terrible concept it allows disinformation to fester and grow unchallenged.

Qstorm is a disinfo sub which relies on censorship to maintain controll it has over its misinformed users, sounds like reddit to me.

If AOU wont demod him or ban qstorm I understand but he should have a bot that keeps ban data that auto stickies itself weekly showing which sub has had the most bans.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

I've seen this exact seniment echoed on Reddit and Voat

AOU doesn't have to do anything more than keep qstorm's content in the qstorm sub

Crensch can do whatever he wants with his own sub.

edit: and stop downvote brigades. which he's taken care of

[–] 2 pts

People dont brigade qstorm, qstorm gets a deluded post to the front page and then gets blown out by regular users.

And OP is generally correct; if the down vote button isn't a disagree button then the ban user button isn't a "super disagree button". Crensch is a petty tyrant that bans users for disagreeing with his deluded boomer userbase and exposing his grifting ass.

Banning him from moderation is justifiable but if the president is unpalatable shaming him for using liberal tactics to prop up his grift is genuinely the least that can be done. If you post a fact he doesn't like he bans you and now none of his users will believe truth because it was banned and they trust crensch's discretion because they are too stupid to reason for themselves.

Greatawakening ruined voat and created the dumbest purity spiral I've ever seen. He genuinely kept a subverse called myshitlist and organized his faithful to brigade users who irked him.

Besides all that he has a sub on the .win network, unless they already banned him off the site.

[–] 2 pts

if the down vote button isn't a disagree button then the ban user button isn't a "super disagree button"

This. Why host a Q sub here, if the sub can't handle free speech? Poal is a free speech forum.

[–] 1 pt

"muh noods."

I'll leave it at that.