Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

442

I skeptically followed the posts almost since the first one. I eventually became convinced it was real, and then let down by the rigged election.

Negating the fact that a lot of the predictions didn’t happen (or haven’t happened yet), there are a couple of things that still stick out to me.

1) Epstein: Q made it a point to post quite a bit about Epstein well before his subsequent arrest and murder in jail. The only people I ever heard rail on Epstein non stop before that all went down were Q and Rush Limbaugh.

2) Child trafficking in general: I honestly had no idea that this sick practice was at all widespread before Q. The issue gained some steam because of Q at the time, but holy shit it’s actually being talked about a ton because of that new movie.

It seems to me that those two issues are quite arbitrary for Q to post about so much without some knowledge about what was coming…

Regardless of what you think about Q personally, you kind of have to admit that he/they are either lucky as hell to nail those issues ahead of their eventual increase in the public consciousness - or - Q knew some stuff ahead of time.

I skeptically followed the posts almost since the first one. I eventually became convinced it was real, and then let down by the rigged election. Negating the fact that a lot of the predictions didn’t happen (or haven’t happened yet), there are a couple of things that still stick out to me. 1) Epstein: Q made it a point to post quite a bit about Epstein well before his subsequent arrest and murder in jail. The only people I ever heard rail on Epstein non stop before that all went down were Q and Rush Limbaugh. 2) Child trafficking in general: I honestly had no idea that this sick practice was at all widespread before Q. The issue gained some steam because of Q at the time, but holy shit it’s actually being talked about a ton because of that new movie. It seems to me that those two issues are quite arbitrary for Q to post about so much without some knowledge about what was coming… Regardless of what you think about Q personally, you kind of have to admit that he/they are either lucky as hell to nail those issues ahead of their eventual increase in the public consciousness - or - Q knew some stuff ahead of time.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (28).
[–] • 0 pt

So what if "Q had inside knowledge," if it was part of a psy-op of course the people behind Q had inside knowledge! They were using vague references to things we already knew in order to build trust and pacify! Child Trafficking and exploitation was already being brought to the forefront of the public consciousness during Pizzagate, but Q was presented to be a sacrificial lamb to kill it by making anyone who talked about child trafficking or powerful pedo groups in high places look like a fucking crazy person.

Don't act like Q was the major reason why people investigated human trafficking. And quit trying to ignore or twist what others are saying, it's a public forum where we can just look up a few comments, or go to other comment threads in the same post where we've already laid out what we said.

As for "Bringing it to the forefront?" Yeah, now there's tons of children being ruined by the government, mutilated by the medical industry and those monsters being protected from any form of criticism by the media, social or mainstream. Child "drag queens," "child friendly" drag shows. More non-White trash flowing over the border than ever before with kidnapped kids as our government breaks down and sells off our resources to the bolt hole countries for the rat-fuck jews in power. The Figurehead of our nation is a dementia-ridden pedophile with a drug addict son that can get away with anything, the Law Enforcement agencies are more likely to arrest you for calling a pedophile a mean name than the actual kiddy fiddler and the Military is being primed to genocide normal, sane Whites.

But oh, that doesn't matter because we said bad things about Q? Why are you so invested in Q when Q has proven to, at this point in time, be nothing more than a smokescreen or scapegoat? Why are you so focused on trying to make Q palatable to people who don't like Q because it made talking about it more difficult by giving people yet another label to distract them and deflect?