Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

805

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-u-s-marines-reserve-units-ordered-to-activate-for-emergency-within-the-united-states.html

Click the main link, read the following article, and watch the embedded vids.

This topic requires serious attention for what could transpire soon. Know what could happen and what DJT might do as a result of it.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-10-06-u-s-marines-reserve-units-ordered-to-activate-for-emergency-within-the-united-states.html Click the main link, read the following article, and watch the embedded vids. This topic requires serious attention for what could transpire soon. Know what could happen and what DJT might do as a result of it.

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

Doom porn for both lefties and righties, but only one side is jerking it.

Nihilists can dream.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

Now this is the action we've been waiting for. Hell if it comes down to it declare martial law, arrest all the government bigwigs in on this and military tribunals where all evidence even stolen is usable and then the firing squads.

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks for your comments.

Good points.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Thanks for posting that great article, actually was decent new reading instead of the same old shit or just garbage posting.

[–] • 1 pt

Thanks for your comment.

I agree with you.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

This is not order, it's an update to the policy regarding activation for emergency.

The author is cherry picking bits to spread a false narrative. Here's is an example from the article:

>This new order is summarized as, “MARINES ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY ISO DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES.”

When in reality this is the summary:

>MANPOWER GUIDANCE FOR ACTIVATION AND DEACTIVATION OF RESERVE COMPONENT MARINES ORDERED TO ACTIVE DUTY ISO DEFENSE SUPPORT OF CIVIL AUTHORITIES

This article is a pack of lies and I'm not surprised, that site is garbage.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

This looks like something that you took from someone else's earlier submission.

You have made some points, all of which have not been backed up by any sources.

The article that I provided is loaded with internal links. Have you read any of them?

Until you provide valid sources for all of your points, everything that you say is unsubstantiated.