WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

951

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Good eye. Why do you read so many transcripts?

[–] 0 pt

I read many legislative histories, which are transcripts, to see why a bill failed or passed. In them, if one failed of a bill I liked, then I can make a new proposed bill (accounting for the reasons why a bill failed) for a sympathetic assemblyman to re-introduce next session.

I read transcripts of many judicial bodies to learn just how stupid our judiciary members are (when I note a case did not swing the way I thought it would)...for those I can affect their continuation as a judge, I try to get them to lose their position. I also read many transcripts from courts of their viewpoint of the law that seems wrong and then contact assemblymen to see if I can find one willing to propose a bill to change the law (some courts see not action by the legislature to be an agreement with their decisions on the meaning of a law).

I have gotten many proposed bills submitted to committees in my state. One got all the way to the floor of one house and passed without a nay vote at all...but it died before being able to get to the next house. And I have gotten many past the committee stages, just to die awaiting a floor vote.

I average about 5 proposed bills a year actually being taken up by my state's assembly. None of my bills ever became law but some are "duplicate" ideas contained in other bills that have become law.

I read about 10 transcripts a week. About 7/10 are quasi judicial and court hearing transcripts, 2/10 are legislative histories, and 1/10 deposition transcripts.

[–] 0 pt

Wow. You don't mess around!

[–] 0 pt

I also obtain access to many public records. One pending one related to a nearby police dept that was going around asking people for DNA samples in public places. Some were happy to give. They had them tested. I am seeking the test results ... DNA are like fingerprints IMO and the DNA results , like fingerprints, should be available. Been waiting since March...at first the police denied even doing it.

The next one is to contact a police dept. for that Ring or "Neighborhood apps" door bell/video recording system that some PDs have latched onto, and get records from a nearby one to see if, in fact, the contract requires PDs to limit their speech about the system to only include positive statements and statements prepared by the "Ring" company. That should be fun.