WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Fellow Patriots and Anons: I am putting snippets of President Trump's remarks below. These are copied and pasted from the official transcript provided by the White House (whitehouse.gov). I added emphasis throughout for some thoughts I have in response.

NOTABLE QUOTABLES:

"I have also been in close contact with Attorney General Barr and FBI Director Wray. Federal authorities are on the ground, and I have directed them to provide any and all assistance required — whatever is needed."

"We have asked the FBI to identify ALL FURTHER RESOURCES THEY NEED to INVESTIGATE and disrupt hate crimes and DOMESTIC TERRORISM — whatever they need."

"We must recognize that the Internet has provided a dangerous avenue to RADICALIZE disturbed minds and perform DEMENTED ACTS. We must SHINE LIGHT ON THE DARK recesses of the Internet, and stop mass murders before they start. The Internet, likewise, is used for HUMAN TRAFFICKING, illegal drug distribution, AND SO MANY OTHER HEINOUS CRIMES. The perils of the Internet and social media cannot be ignored, and they will not be ignored."

"First, we must do a better job of IDENTIFYING and ACTING on EARLY WARNING SIGNS. I am directing the Department of Justice to work in partisan — partnership with local, state, and federal agencies, as well as SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES, to develop tools that can detect mass shooters before they strike."

"As an example, the monster in the Parkland high school in Florida had MANY RED FLAGS against him, and yet NOBODY TOOK DECISIVE ACTION. Nobody did anything. Why not?"

"Second, we must stop the GLORIFICATION OF VIOLENCE in our society. This includes the GRUESOME and GRISLY video games that are now commonplace. It is too easy today for troubled youth to surround themselves with a culture that CELEBRATES VIOLENCE. We must stop or substantially reduce this, and it has to begin immediately. CULTURAL CHANGE is hard, but each of us can choose to build a culture that celebrates the inherent worth and dignity of every human life. That’s what we have to do."

"Fourth, we must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms, and that, if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process. That is why I have called for RED FLAG LAWS, also known as extreme risk protection orders."

"Today, I am also directing the Department of Justice to propose legislation ensuring that those who COMMIT HATE CRIMES and MASS MURDERS face the DEATH PENALTY, and that this capital punishment be delivered quickly, decisively, and without years of needless delay."

MY THOUGHTS & COMMENTS:

  1. POTUS Specifically mentioned AG Barr and Dir. Wray. Were those name drops the result of happenstance due to the nature of their jobs or was it a subtle reminder? ("TRUST WRAY") POTUS Then went on to mention that Federal authorities are on the ground (I am assuming the FBI) and will provide any and all assistance required. To do what? Identify ALL FURTHER RESOURCES THEY NEED to INVESTIGATE and disrupt hate crimes and DOMESTIC TERRORISM. Could this entail the FBI investigating 8CHAN and bringing that channel further into the light? How about following leads on the reports of multiple shooters clad in all-black? Remember, much has happened since Las Vegas and we are now in a totally different phase of "The Plan." Think mirror: charges of leaking dropped on Comey in anticipation of bigger charges? What if investigating these two shootings brings attention back onto the Las Vegas shooting and yields investigative results?

  2. This one dovetails off the first point: POTUS used the words "...shine light on the dark... ("DARK TO LIGHT") and further comments on the Internet as a source of darkness... to include HUMAN TRAFFICKING and other heinous crimes (...like raping children and slicing their faces off?). This sounds like a very all-inclusive look at the bigger problem rather than just pointing the finger at guns. This makes me hope that, between the lines of his remarks, we are receiving a message akin to, "An evil thing was done and we're going to investigate, shine light on the dark, and deal with this. Not the part the Deep State wants you to think is responsible, but the true origin." I hope POTUS's emphasis on the Internet's role in these shootings bring 8chan into the limelight. The question is when Q intended to make another post and whether that will happen given these circumstances. The Deep State put a lot of negative pressure on Q's primary comms channel this weekend and has tried to make it vulnerable.

  3. The remarks on early warning signs and the role of social media was a welcome sign. In conjunction with efforts POTUS is calling for, he is now poised to hold entities such as ANTIFA accountable for what they are posting online (especially if FBI investigations reveal and force discussion regarding the perps' affiliations and affinities). As horrible as this sounds, the DS forcing two FFs to literally shoot at Q's credibility might backfire and ricochet right back into their faces. Think of how bad it could get for them when it's revealed that people knew about these perps, but did nothing to stop them from (if not egged them on to) commit their crimes?

  4. POTUS was also very direct in highlighting our glorification and celebration of violence. He named video games, but thing bigger: Hollywood, Epstein, the Clinton/Abedin video, etc. POTUS also mentioned cultural change, which ties right back into the Deep State's long-term "fundamental transformation of America" theme that began to hit the terminal phase in 2008.

  5. This is my toughest point that I'm still chewing on. I am not a fan of POTUS's moves against bump stocks and suppressors, so my initial reaction is to categorize his remarks on red flag policies in the same as the aforementioned two: chinks against the Second Amendment that he SHOULD NOT be budging on. He should be digging in and refusing to let others dictate his policy via manufactured tragedy. My reservation is that DJT will not be president forever (nor should he be). Whether it is in 2020 (God help us) or 2024, someone else will become POTUS... and if they are not a patriot, they will assuredly use any pre-existing red flag laws to punish and subdue armed patriots across the country. HOWEVER, here is how I am optimistically (forcibly so) reading this: in conjunction with points 1 and 2, what if this turns into his casus belli to not only label ANTIFA as domestic terrorism, but take action against them to include disarmament and execution?

All of this said, there is A LOT to chew on and think about. It wasn't the "spit-in-the-Deep-State's-face" kind of speech we want, but we are playing a game... one with very real and DEADLY consequences. The reality is that, despite the incredible things Q has done both within our view and behind the scenes, the Deep State is still capable of inflicting casualties. WE WILL WIN in the end, as NOTHING can stop what is coming for them, but that doesn't mean we won't experience losses. This past weekend was two cases of such.

What are your thoughts, Patriots?

And a final comment: I say all of this as a manner of taking action in the form of good discussion with fellow Anons. Who knows when Q will next post, especially in light of what's going on with 8chan. We call ourselves Patriots, but we cannot be passive. That doesn't mean to go off half cocked or do something irrational, but to methodically and strategically keep the momentum.

WWG1WGA!

Fellow Patriots and Anons: I am putting snippets of President Trump's remarks below. These are copied and pasted from the [official transcript provided by the White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-mass-shootings-texas-ohio/). I added emphasis throughout for some thoughts I have in response. #NOTABLE QUOTABLES: *"I have also been in close contact with Attorney General Barr and FBI Director Wray. Federal authorities are on the ground, and I have directed them to provide any and all assistance required — whatever is needed."* *"We have asked the FBI to identify ALL FURTHER RESOURCES THEY NEED to INVESTIGATE and disrupt hate crimes and DOMESTIC TERRORISM — whatever they need."* *"We must recognize that the Internet has provided a dangerous avenue to RADICALIZE disturbed minds and perform DEMENTED ACTS. We must SHINE LIGHT ON THE DARK recesses of the Internet, and stop mass murders before they start. The Internet, likewise, is used for HUMAN TRAFFICKING, illegal drug distribution, AND SO MANY OTHER HEINOUS CRIMES. The perils of the Internet and social media cannot be ignored, and they will not be ignored."* *"First, we must do a better job of IDENTIFYING and ACTING on EARLY WARNING SIGNS. I am directing the Department of Justice to work in partisan — partnership with local, state, and federal agencies, as well as SOCIAL MEDIA COMPANIES, to develop tools that can detect mass shooters before they strike."* *"As an example, the monster in the Parkland high school in Florida had MANY RED FLAGS against him, and yet NOBODY TOOK DECISIVE ACTION. Nobody did anything. Why not?"* *"Second, we must stop the GLORIFICATION OF VIOLENCE in our society. This includes the GRUESOME and GRISLY video games that are now commonplace. It is too easy today for troubled youth to surround themselves with a culture that CELEBRATES VIOLENCE. We must stop or substantially reduce this, and it has to begin immediately. CULTURAL CHANGE is hard, but each of us can choose to build a culture that celebrates the inherent worth and dignity of every human life. That’s what we have to do."* *"Fourth, we must make sure that those judged to pose a grave risk to public safety do not have access to firearms, and that, if they do, those firearms can be taken through rapid due process. That is why I have called for RED FLAG LAWS, also known as extreme risk protection orders."* *"Today, I am also directing the Department of Justice to propose legislation ensuring that those who COMMIT HATE CRIMES and MASS MURDERS face the DEATH PENALTY, and that this capital punishment be delivered quickly, decisively, and without years of needless delay."* #MY THOUGHTS & COMMENTS: 1. POTUS Specifically mentioned AG Barr and Dir. Wray. Were those name drops the result of happenstance due to the nature of their jobs or was it a subtle reminder? (*"TRUST WRAY"*) POTUS Then went on to mention that Federal authorities are on the ground (I am assuming the FBI) and will provide *any and all* assistance required. To do what? *Identify ALL FURTHER RESOURCES THEY NEED to INVESTIGATE and disrupt hate crimes and DOMESTIC TERRORISM.* Could this entail the FBI *investigating 8CHAN* and bringing that channel further into the light? How about following leads on the reports of multiple shooters clad in all-black? Remember, much has happened since Las Vegas and we are now in a totally different phase of "The Plan." Think mirror: charges of leaking dropped on Comey in anticipation of bigger charges? What if investigating these two shootings brings attention back onto the Las Vegas shooting and yields investigative results? 2. This one dovetails off the first point: POTUS used the words *"...shine light on the dark...* (*"DARK TO LIGHT"*) and further comments on the Internet as a source of darkness... to include HUMAN TRAFFICKING and other heinous crimes (...like raping children and slicing their faces off?). This sounds like a very all-inclusive look at the bigger problem rather than just pointing the finger at guns. This makes me hope that, between the lines of his remarks, we are receiving a message akin to, "An evil thing was done and we're going to investigate, shine light on the dark, and deal with this. Not the part the Deep State wants you to think is responsible, but the true origin." I hope POTUS's emphasis on the Internet's role in these shootings bring 8chan into the limelight. The question is when Q intended to make another post and whether that will happen given these circumstances. The Deep State put *a lot* of negative pressure on Q's primary comms channel this weekend and has tried to make it vulnerable. 3. The remarks on early warning signs and the role of social media was a welcome sign. In conjunction with efforts POTUS is calling for, he is now poised to hold entities such as ANTIFA accountable for what they are posting online (especially if FBI investigations reveal and force discussion regarding the perps' affiliations and affinities). As horrible as this sounds, the DS forcing two FFs to literally shoot at Q's credibility might backfire and ricochet right back into their faces. Think of how bad it could get for them when it's revealed that people *knew* about these perps, but did nothing to stop them from (if not egged them on to) commit their crimes? 4. POTUS was also very direct in highlighting our glorification and celebration of violence. He named video games, but thing bigger: Hollywood, Epstein, the Clinton/Abedin video, etc. POTUS also mentioned cultural change, which ties right back into the Deep State's long-term "fundamental transformation of America" theme that began to hit the terminal phase in 2008. 5. This is my toughest point that I'm still chewing on. I am not a fan of POTUS's moves against bump stocks and suppressors, so my initial reaction is to categorize his remarks on red flag policies in the same as the aforementioned two: chinks against the Second Amendment that he *SHOULD NOT* be budging on. He should be digging in and refusing to let others dictate his policy via manufactured tragedy. My reservation is that DJT *will not* be president forever (nor should he be). Whether it is in 2020 (God help us) or 2024, someone else will become POTUS... and if they are not a patriot, they will assuredly use any pre-existing red flag laws to punish and subdue armed patriots across the country. HOWEVER, here is how I am optimistically (forcibly so) reading this: in conjunction with points 1 and 2, what if this turns into his casus belli to not only label ANTIFA as domestic terrorism, but take action against them to include disarmament and execution? All of this said, there is A LOT to chew on and think about. It wasn't the "spit-in-the-Deep-State's-face" kind of speech we want, but we are playing a game... *one with very real and DEADLY consequences*. The reality is that, despite the incredible things Q has done both within our view and behind the scenes, the Deep State is still capable of inflicting casualties. WE WILL WIN in the end, as NOTHING can stop what is coming for them, but that doesn't mean we won't experience losses. This past weekend was two cases of such. What are your thoughts, Patriots? And a final comment: I say all of this as a manner of taking action in the form of good discussion with fellow Anons. Who knows when Q will next post, especially in light of what's going on with 8chan. We call ourselves Patriots, but we cannot be passive. That doesn't mean to go off half cocked or do something irrational, but to methodically and strategically keep the momentum. ##WWG1WGA!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

This is a good post. Do you have access to VOAT? If not, let me know, and I will post it on Voat for you.


REMEMBER: Trump is Q+!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://poal.co/s/QStorm/81549


Someone just posted this excellent comment on Voat....these UNconstitutional laws are going NO WHERE:

[–] redtoe_skipper 21 minutes ago

So, lemmie get this straight. Potus wants conservative justices on the supreme court who interpret the 2nd A as written. Correct?

Let's assume a red flag law comes through, Potus signs, somebody challenges that in court. It's struck down ... Done deal, right?

Of course the dems want more gun control. That is their wetdream. Ok, so here you get a little bit of a wetdream, but it is connected to immigration reform. Shit shit shit, No what? ....

Ok after a long deliberation, forced or not, this package get's through and signed into law. Then somebody challenges the red flag laws. It's struck down. Voila.

You think only the dems have interest groups with lawyers who can aim at enjoining in all states? You really think that? Well, perhaps it is time to consider the practice of lawfare. Or would you say Judicial Watch got what they have for nothing?


This was posted on Voat, I will just re-post here:

POTUS Tweet T-7338, Telling Anons He Is Turning Up The Heat And To Trust The Plan!

POTUS Tweet T-7338

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1158420246119768064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1158420246119768064&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fqmap.pub%2F

Simple Gematria

FOREVER = 89

august = 89

find out = 89

complete = 89

life and death = 89

charge time = 89

Q 89

Open Investigation Clinton Foundation

https://qmap.pub/read/89

Timestamp 12:51 PM

1200 +/- rule

Q 51

We Hear You

https://qmap.pub/read/51

Q 1251

Listen carefully.

Trust the plan.

https://qmap.pub/read/1251

[–] 0 pt

No to Red Flag laws. This is a game changer for me. Anything further against the 2nd Amendment is a game changer for me. There are enough laws on the books. Anything further is a red line. "Shall not be infringed" I am a strong Trump supporter since day 1 but this is the red line. I don't care about using red flag laws to label Antifa. No.No. NO!

[–] 0 pt

Did you miss this???

Right now, Trump has to appear to play ball with the deep state who control the House. Trump, a master negotiator, throws in a small gun control concession, in exchange for something much bigger and more important to save this country. But all these concessions will be repealed OVER NIGHT once Capitol Hill gets GUTTED of the Deep State!

THIS IS NO ORDINARY PRESIDENCY!!!!!!!!!

THIS IS NO ORDINARY PRESIDENT!!!!!

THIS IS THE 2ND AMERICAN REVOLUTION!!!!!!!!!

STAY FOCUSED!!!!!

Someone just posted this excellent comment....these UNconstitutional laws are going NO WHERE:

[–] redtoe_skipper 21 minutes ago

So, lemmie get this straight. Potus wants conservative justices on the supreme court who interpret the 2nd A as written. Correct?

Let's assume a red flag law comes through, Potus signs, somebody challenges that in court. It's struck down ... Done deal, right?

Of course the dems want more gun control. That is their wetdream. Ok, so here you get a little bit of a wetdream, but it is connected to immigration reform. Shit shit shit, No what? ....

Ok after a long deliberation, forced or not, this package get's through and signed into law. Then somebody challenges the red flag laws. It's struck down. Voila.

You think only the dems have interest groups with lawyers who can aim at enjoining in all states? You really think that? Well, perhaps it is time to consider the practice of lawfare. Or would you say Judicial Watch got what they have for nothing?

[–] 0 pt

The only other thing I can think of is that red flag laws are being floated as a discussion point to get moderates to pay attention. What if there's no real intention of actually passing such laws, but he's getting people plugged into the conversation?

With the extremely vitriolic rhetoric spewing out of the MSM right now, digging in his heels would close a lot of people off who may be on the fence. These two events did ramp up the emotions of the nation and at such a time, the prudent negotiator knows using facts and logic works on some, but bounces off of those running on raw emotion alone.

Just playing devil's advocate and tossing ideas out there. Not saying I'm right or that it justifies red flag laws.