WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

538

Putt, the Owner of Voat, put this up on the front page:

Voat is being attacked and our poor little goats are exhausted. You can take down a site with your botnet and unlimited money, but you won't win in your fight against truth. You know you've already lost. For everyone that isn't familiar with Voat, Voat is a Free Speech website, and a lot of powerful people don't like some of the things the Goats discuss.

This seems to have made someone mad:
https://archive.fo/ArZdi (Archive Link)


Earlier, he said that above link was causing a DDoS attack.
I posted it here.
https://poal.co/s/QStorm/78584

**Putt, the Owner of Voat, put this up on the front page:** Voat is being attacked and our poor little goats are exhausted. You can take down a site with your botnet and unlimited money, but you won't win in your fight against truth. You know you've already lost. For everyone that isn't familiar with Voat, Voat is a Free Speech website, and a lot of powerful people don't like some of the things the Goats discuss. This seems to have made someone mad: https://archive.fo/ArZdi (Archive Link) *** Earlier, he said that above link was causing a DDoS attack. I posted it here. https://poal.co/s/QStorm/78584

(post is archived)

[–] -2 pt

You got shitposters because of the censorship by Crensch, who did an almost complete turnabout on both actions and principles. He's probably the second biggest asshole there.

[–] 0 pt

And we all know who the first is.

Here's a hint:

YOU.

[–] 0 pt

Wrong. That spot is reserved for theoldones.

[–] 0 pt

The only people who dislike are pedophiles.

[–] 0 pt

Since you're a rude coward, I will ping for you.

[–] 0 pt

Then why are you over here bitching about it? Go to PV like all the other fags

[–] -1 pt

Because I don't trust Voat as a free speech site nor Putt as an impartial and fair admin. I've explained to Putt before that his vague rules would cause plenty of strife and subjective bannings, to which I was caught up in despite not doing anything that violated the rules. He also checked who downvoted his whack ass builder's posts for personal reasons and declared many were destroyers to be banned (chilling effect). More relevant to you, between zyklon doxxing srayzie and srayzie doxxing gothamgirl, why should only zyklon and his pals be banned when both groups did the same thing?

I've been on that site under different names since the WhoaVerse days before edgy kids took over. Crensch built up his reputation on Voat by being the holohoaxer, through long posts eviscerating users one at a time, and an anti-censorship stance. He has completely flipped his position on two of three. The only thing unchanged is his long posts attacking specific users (has done this to longtime Pizzagate users who post research). Either he:

  • Sold out.

  • Played the long con.

  • Behaved like a chameleon.

No matter what, Crensch is the last person I'd trust to own a sub dedicated to sharing extensive information and research.

[–] 2 pts

More relevant to you, between zyklon doxxing srayzie and srayzie doxxing gothamgirl, why should only zyklon and his pals be banned when both groups did the same thing?

How is this relevant to me? Besides, Zyklon doxxed Srayzie and GothamGirl. You don't even know the real story.

As for Crensch, he doesn't delete research. He just doesn't deal with assholes that are there just to shit post or fight. People that want to use "free speech" as an excuse to forum slide, attack users simply for being pro Trump, spread lies about moderators and post porn, he doesn't tolerate. He doesn't have to. Pizzagate and GreatAwakening are private subs. If anything, he's protecting the research and information and allowing people to focus.

If you don't like it, feel free to not go there. How does bitching at me fix it? Whether or not you like Putt or Crensch doesn't affect me.