So, the Secret Service is twice as worthless as we first thought they were...
So, the Secret Service is twice as worthless as we first thought they were...
Interesting, but Meh, i dunno man. The three gun scenario can be accounted by the first initial salvo of three shots - skimming of the ear/ ricochetting off the metal railing and striking the two wounded on the third set of bleachers - and striking of the hydraulic line - the pause and second salvo of 4-5 shots - striking the volunteer fire fighter in the first set of bleachers - then a single SS sniper shot.
Why do We still have no exact confirmation on which actual sniper team took the shot?.
Was it team one - the agent bobbing his head up etc (i dont think so). Team two - on the 2nd sloped roof over to team one behind trump. Or team three - allegedly from a post earlier that day - on the roof of a lone building halfway down the field - with a clear sight to the Glass factory roof.
@18mins analyzing the sound from the cell phone - did they take into account that after capturing the first three shots the person runs forward and holds the phone at a 70-110 degree angle to previous - will the new position of the phone's microphone have an effect on the acoustics being recorded - and will the position of the hand possibly over or obstructing the microphone change the sound of acoustics?.
Finally how will the acoustics differ to the stage microphone, when one salvo travel past the microphone and the second salvo strike befor e the microphone ??.
i will always contend the last shot is the SS sniper team taking out the suspect (suppressed subsonic 308 ??)
Interesting, but Meh, i dunno man.
The three gun scenario can be accounted by the first initial salvo of three shots - skimming of the ear/ ricochetting off the metal railing and striking the two wounded on the third set of bleachers - and striking of the hydraulic line - the pause and second salvo of 4-5 shots - striking the volunteer fire fighter in the first set of bleachers - then a single SS sniper shot.
Why do We still have no exact confirmation on which actual sniper team took the shot?.
Was it team one - the agent bobbing his head up etc (i dont think so). Team two - on the 2nd sloped roof over to team one behind trump.
Or team three - allegedly from a post earlier that day - on the roof of a lone building halfway down the field - with a clear sight to the Glass factory roof.
@18mins analyzing the sound from the cell phone - did they take into account that after capturing the first three shots the person runs forward and holds the phone at a 70-110 degree angle to previous - will the new position of the phone's microphone have an effect on the acoustics being recorded - and will the position of the hand possibly over or obstructing the microphone change the sound of acoustics?.
Finally how will the acoustics differ to the stage microphone, when one salvo travel past the microphone and the second salvo strike befor e the microphone ??.
i will always contend the last shot is the SS sniper team taking out the suspect (suppressed subsonic 308 ??)
That’s neat. But someone needs to explain to dude that the camera guy in audio 2 (18 min and on mark)spun around and cell phone microphones behave very differently with sounds based on direction, and the echos are also explained by this. The different trajectory calcs are more important I think.
That’s neat. But someone needs to explain to dude that the camera guy in audio 2 (18 min and on mark)spun around and cell phone microphones behave very differently with sounds based on direction, and the echos are also explained by this. The different trajectory calcs are more important I think.
Yep, that is what i thought too.
Then this guy puts out three/ four possible scenarios - he's not even sure himself of what he's offering - even opines crooks firing all the shots except for shots 2 and 6 iirc, completely discrediting half the video he just put forth of the second salvo coming from a different position etc.
Interesting, but ultimately losing himself in too many 'what if's'.
Yep, that is what i thought too.
Then this guy puts out three/ four possible scenarios - he's not even sure himself of what he's offering - even opines crooks firing all the shots except for shots 2 and 6 iirc, completely discrediting half the video he just put forth of the second salvo coming from a different position etc.
Interesting, but ultimately losing himself in too many 'what if's'.
(post is archived)