I'm willing to have a simple Q&A. Your characterization is dishonest which says a lot, doesn't it?
Are you willing to have an honest discussion?
Funny how you didn't say you would have an honest discussion.
Moving on...
Funny how you didn't say you would have an honest discussion.
Hahaha - touché
Oy vey, shut it down...
Let's be frank here, someone can't and won't defend their position yet lecture people that everyone else is wrong, an honest person can admit it raises legitimate questions about their intent. And yet you manipulated the exchange and did nothing but project. Which in turn raises legitimate questions about intent.
Accordingly, when someone baselessly and continuously makes accusations, an honest person understands it sounds only as projection...
Isn't honesty fun!?
Moving on...
If you're honest
Are you willing to have an honest discussion?
Honesty is not your cup of tea.
Example:
Is it confirmed there are multiple Hilarys and multiple Bidens? Is it confirmed the CIA has mastered mask technology?
These are not tricky questions. There's no "ah-has". They only require your intellectual honesty - or admission you don't know as much as you claim (no shame in that).
I have some stuff to do, but I am willing to have an intellectually honest discussion. Are you?
So you all now pivot that it's not White hat insiders who have it all and are in control fighting to bring back the constitutional republic - but rather a 'pysop' to encourage 'citizens' to stand up, vote harder, and do all the work instead.
Lol, legit cult behavior 101 - if it fails the onus is always on the believer.
(post is archived)