Fact? Where is the irrefutable proof that establishes that this is a fact?
I'm using the same source you have used over and over for your "facts". You take everything else that Gen Flynn says as absolute fact but now are calling this "opinion". And let's not pretend that any source for just about any topic is irrefutable. There is always some doubt about everything because people will always find a way to disqualify whatever they dislike or disagree with. That's something dealing with Q believers, flat Earthers, fake moon landing zealots, jews and other conspiracy theorists has taught me. No one will ever accept anything they don't want to be true. I think truth and fact from even God himself would not convince those types.
You take everything else that Gen Flynn says as absolute fact but now are calling this "opinion".
Flynn has never said he was of the opinion that Q was a jewish psyop. Do you accept that as a fact? I am of the opinion Flynn helped to develop the )))Q psyop(((.
There is always some doubt about everything because people will always find a way to disqualify whatever they dislike or disagree with.
I have seen this many times too. Some things you can't just tell someone and they will believe you, you have to show them irrefutable proof. And even then some are so emotionally invested in their opinion they cannot accept the hard facts.
That's something dealing with Q believers, flat Earthers, fake moon landing zealots
I agree for some Q believers that were led astray by various (((grifters))) spreading their lies, misinfo and disinfo. Those that strayed were easily manipulated emotionally, did not use discernment, do their own tesearch, got sucked into (((bullshit))) and looked like fools. This can happen to some members of any group if the (((grifters))) are convincing enough, thus making the whole group look like idiots.
I do my best to not become emotionally invested in my opinion of things I don't 100% understand. This is of great benefit when seeking truth. If I am presented with irrefutable proof that my opinion of something is in error, I gleefully change my opinion to reflect the new truth and do not waste time defending a defective opinion. If the proof presented is not truly convincing or irrefutable, why should I accept it?
Flynn has said nothing to disparage the Q movement. As a psyop, it completed its task and brought millions of truth seekers together while educating them about the (((unknown evil))) running this world. It pulled back the curtain for all who wanted to see. It awakened millions of goyem to the (((threat))). That's all good stuff, and not what (((the puppetmasters))) ever wanted to happen. Flynn's only message here is intended to activate any complacent anons in the Q movement to fight fight fight as he has said many times over the past year. His statement that mil is not coming to rescue us is part of his desire to eliminate that complacency and get everyone activated. Flynn did not mention CoG, Devolution, Trump's EADs ... they were never specifically mentioned in the Q psyop either. I do believe Trump initiated CoG before leaving office, and I have not seen anything to disprove that opinion - yet.
(post is archived)