Vector, my sincere thanks for your many contributions. My thoughts on gematria; Q never specifically mentioned the word "gematria" in the drops. Simple gematria to convey a name, place or time (or a Q drop) I can understand, but many of the internet gematria whiz kids (Neon Revolt for one) had long lists of bullshit phrases with numeric values that they referred to in their decodes, indicating to me that everyone in that communication would need to have their own super secret spy decoder rings loaded with these same phrases to figure out what was actually being conveyed. That's where gematria turned me off, the whiz kids lost me there. Dan Scavino's tweet timestamps worked for me, a subtle and straightforward approach to communication and that approach was correctly used in forming most Q proofs. Scavino never used gematria that I am aware of. I don't recall any Q proofs using gematria in an anon agreed upon proof. These are the reasons why I generally get uncomfortable at the mention of Q using gematria. This is just my opinion and I'm not trying to convince others - I'm not a gematria whiz kid (same as most everyone else) so I may be missing something. In the big picture it doesn't seem to much matter now, we are in a different phase of the awakening, there are no more Q drops to decode, old drops are fulfilling "future proves past" without appying gematria, Trump and Scavino appear to continue to use timestamps when conveying a hidden message or Q drop association.