Should we expect a mass admission that Qtards were wrong all along or do you all prefer to do individual statements on how you were wrong?
You should expect nothing to change because no new information can change my opinion on the old information I've already confirmed to be true when I stored it in my head in the first place. WWG1WGA
You should expect nothing to change because no new information can change my opinion on the old information I've already confirmed to be true when I stored it in my head in the first place. WWG1WGA
The jews thank you for your service to their agenda. MIGA
MAGA
Also, you're the one to capitaize the "i". Not me.
Lol! I said it was a psyop long ago.
https://poal.co/s/QStorm/674695/bf58b207-71a1-4cf6-9b51-7c6664af9ab8#cmnts
Of course it's a psyop. Psyop simply means something to make you feel or see something. Psyops are not inherently good or bad, it's what you do with it which matters.
Lol! I said it was a psyop long ago.
Don't make me go pull up your old Voat comment history...
VOAT is ancient history now. Q's last post was almost a year ago. The psyop has long ended. Keep in mind CoG, devolution and EADs are all constitutional and the responsibility of POTUS. What Flynn said does not change that; plus CoG, devolution and EADs were never mentioned by Q.
https://poal.co/s/QStorm/674695/bf58b207-71a1-4cf6-9b51-7c6664af9ab8#cmnts
As usual, people here talk out their ass without actually understanding what has been stated. You're so blinded by Jewish propaganda you can't for a second consider that you don't actually know what's going on.
As usual, people here talk out their ass without actually understanding what has been stated. You're so blinded by Jewish propaganda you can't for a second consider that you don't actually know what's going on.
Sorry, I'm not going to let you (((bait))) me into one of your (((discussions))). We've been there too many times before and I'm not going to waste my time on another one.
I'm willing to have a simple Q&A. Your characterization is dishonest which says a lot, doesn't it?
If you're honest, which seems very iffy at this point, I believe we can confirm you don't actually know what's going on (not saying I fully do either). But it requires intellectual honesty and consistency (no hypocrisy). Can you do that?
Are you willing to have an honest discussion? Or is it more important to you to (((project))) and baselessly (((accuse))), with the aim to (((shut it down)))?
(post is archived)