the host glares at the guest and seems to remind himself not to
'Let’s say an exception is granted and cameras are allowed in the courtroom. Not only is that a historic win for Trump, but he now has the international spotlight on him — and, just as importantly, on his prosecutors. (On a far less important note, can you imagine the ratings that a televised trial of a former U.S. president would do? Trump would love to be able to take credit for that bonanza.) Now, if cameras are denied, as Roberts so smugly assured us they would be, that’s still a win for Trump. Now the case takes on a whole new air of suspicion.' - a genuinely ingenious move up his sleeve.
OMG, who writes this dog and pony garbage?.
No chance in that happening. They'll just say that for purposes of (((national security))) that it must remain opaque to the world.
(((Adam Schiff))) and other Dems wanted it broadcast too. Since the Dems want it, Trump wants it, it could happen. We'll see. I don't think the Dems know what they are in for.
(post is archived)