INever posted a twitter comment without quotes - making it appear that the statement was INever's.
lol You want to play the drama-concern-lying-jew, I'm game.
INever posted a link to https://nitter.net/HansMahncke/status/1607560871898669057#m (archive: https://archive.ph/XCfZw)
and titled it "Here is the Face of White Privilege"
Now show me that exact same sentence in that tweet.
I don't get it, what exactly did he do wrong?
Read again until you get it.
He posted a link of a jew and titled it the face of white privilege?
It appears you are pointing out your own failure to identify and remove alt accounts.Strange how they all seem to be in this sub, upvoting . Seems a smart person, like you , could figure this out and remove the egregious rule breakers/s.
lol You're still mad at me.
Maybe I'm not understanding something bc it seems if the sleepers can be identified, then they can be removed. It seems like it would be better to block the sleeper accounts than let the sleepers destroy a real user's account. It's like being sent to jail for a theft you didn't commit while the actual thieves continue to steal with abandon.
And it makes no sense that INever would be connected to the sleeper accounts - Why would someone continue using sleeper accounts to basically nuke their own account? There's absolutely no advantage to that for INever.
Strange how they all seem to be in this sub, upvoting
Good point. There have apparently been problems with that in the past, but, to my knowledge, no one else in the sub is currently being affected by sleeper accounts. Why would the sleepers be targeting only @INeverGiveUp ? INever's posts are quite similar to other posts - seems those posts would be hit as well. I can't remember a situation like INever's happening before - where someone is losing hundreds of points at a time and can never get into positive points.
Speaking of points, let's say INever starts out the day at-100 points. During the day, INever makes five posts and each of those posts gets 10 points. So at the end of the day, INever has -50 points. The next morning INever logs on and now has a score of -550 (consistent with the point differences I've witnessed happening.) So if each sleeper account could only upvote each post one time that means, on average, for the five posts, there would have to be about 100 sleeper accounts. Why would 100 sleeper accounts be so focused on INever while ignoring everyone else? I guess I'm not smart enough to understand all this complicated stuff bc it makes no sense.
I'm not playing anything:
Perhaps I didn't explain accurately, but it was a convoluted series of tweets, as I described at the time it happened. https://pic8.co/sh/6cFkjx.png
Links to original tweets:
Edit: The content of the tweets isn't what's important - it's the continual point losses making INevers account basically nonfunctional.
Perhaps I didn't explain accurately,
Yes you did. You just parroted what INever told you.
but it was a convoluted series of tweets, as I described at the time it happened.
No, it was not. You are now doubling down on your lies.
Read my sticky comment again, that's exactly what happened. No other tweet involved.
Treated So Terribly?
lol Another lie.
He's getting upvoted by sleeper accounts who are doing nothing but upvote his posts. So when they get noticed, their votes get cancelled and thus INever's score.
How is that possible?
It's not like INever's posts are averaging 40 up-votes when other posts are averaging five - INever's post scores are consistent with the scores other users' posts receive.
But let's hypothetically assume that INever gets an average of six points per post. Even if half of those votes are from sleeper accounts (which I don't believe they are,) it doesn't explain how in one day INever can go from -400 to -700 points overnight or why I Never never gets in positive points despite their consistent posting history.
AOU kicking ass and taking names!
If you don't like how users are treated by the admin of this site - fck off and start your own !! . Lmao
Do you not recognize your hypocrisy?
(post is archived)