Read the sticky comment.
White people have been replaced because of our empathy toward non-White.
He exposed himself with an anti-White title he wrote himself. Even though he and his patriot friends are lying about it saying it was a tweet and he forgot to quote it.
I read the sticky, the title of the post, looked at the tweet.
I see 'Here is the Face of White Privilege' post title, then see the tweet image of 2 jews. I immediately think INeverGiveUp is pointing out another example of shapeshifting jews that move through society exercising their jewish debauchery while cloaked as "Whites" - which feeds MSM to confuse the masses into believing Whites are to blame for the jewish debauchery. This seems pretty much in line with many posts I've seen here exposing jewish shapeshifting to impugn Whites.
Is there a flaw in my interpretation or have I missed a salient point of this post because I still feel the infraction does not merit the severe punishment. My 2 cents fwiw now that I have seen the 'offending' post.
50 lashes with a wet bagel!
Lol! A fitting punishment!
have I missed a salient point of this post because I still feel the infraction does not merit the severe punishment.
Agree - it started with that tweet, but the tweet isn't the issue. The issue is that, repeatedly over the last six months, a consistent poster loses hundreds of points as soon as they start to get in the black.
Yes, I noticed soon after he was wiped back then and have made a few comments about it to him. It is much like a torture chamber, early on he gets just barely in the black and boom! -300pts. He chews his way back to near zero and boom back to -450, on and on. I've seen him down to nearly -900pts before. In the meantime, restricted capabilities when posting. POALs Penalty Point Purgatory into perpetuity. He's stuck halfway between those who get their points wiped and have to start over and those who simply get the boot. I like the guy, he's been a good poster, put a lot of time into it. He finds and has posted a lot of stuff of interest to me.
it started with that tweet, but the tweet isn't the issue.
Yes it is and you both got caught lying about it.
The issue is that
No, it's not, no matter how many times you'll repeat it.
a consistent poster loses hundreds of points
An anti-White liar loses hundreds of artificial upvotes from sleeper accounts created exclusively for that purpose.
So keep ignoring answers and stay in your delusional wonderland.
Is there a flaw in my interpretation
Yes, you fell for it.
White people have been replaced because of our empathy toward non-White.
Yeah, that's unfortunate but that's what it is, and there's more... We would have been crazy talibans massacring anything not just like them on their territory we would be better off, but that wouldn't have been us at the time, the story of catholicism is quite impressive in that regard... "We" did massacre anything not "just like us" on our respective territories for a long period of time actually https://youtu.be/xFIXMM1KWyc?t=6214 and it didn't provide the best results in the end, while it did provide broad unity https://youtu.be/xFIXMM1KWyc?t=3430 some 500 years earlier. Now the racial dimension of wwII plus the staggering body count associated to it, really killed the whole concept of war over race, it's been fatal for the whole idea, fatal like bud light for anheuser–busch ideologically speaking... Just like it's been for catholicisim in the end, it's the 900 pounds sandbag from the 3rd floor that broke the camel's back, too much casualties associated with the concept itself, "never again never fugget'" giving birth to new currents, galaxy of splinter ideological currents in the end and later generations got bamboozled by the victors and it's like that, too bad, now we're dealing with the sequels... It's been almost a century now but it's still a virtually unmitigated and integral part of our cultural heritage, with the very real consequences that we all know coming attached to it
He exposed himself with an anti-White title he wrote himself.
Well the renaming of the tweet isn't that much of an antiwhite statement, it can be perceived as such eventually, but not necessarily IMO, especially here where we all know it's a kike pictured in the tweet and who's promoting antiwhite rhetoric
Even though he and his patriot friends are lying about it saying it was a tweet and he forgot to quote it.
Yeah that's sus to invoke such explanation for the name of the tweet, that's for sure, when it could have simply been a "well sry that's not what I meant I wanted to point at the fact that once again yet another kike is actually the one enjoying the actual ethnic privilege and getting away with murder" instead of relying on a blatant lie, indeed... Now maybe he wanted to say quotes as in: the face of "white privilege"
(post is archived)