Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.5K

INeverGiveUp is a long-term and consistent contributor to this sub.

Nearly six months ago, INever posted a twitter comment without quotes - making it appear that the statement was INever's. For that error, INever's account remains in the negative and is essentially nonfunctional for anything other than posting.

Despite this awful treatment, INever has lived up to their name and continues to post without complaint.

Where is our support for INever?

If we can't stand for each other, we stand for nothing.

INeverGiveUp is a long-term and consistent contributor to this sub. Nearly six months ago, INever posted a twitter comment without quotes - making it appear that the statement was INever's. For that error, INever's account remains in the negative and is essentially nonfunctional for anything other than posting. Despite this awful treatment, INever has lived up to their name and continues to post without complaint. Where is our support for INever? **If we can't stand for each other, we stand for nothing.**

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (134).
[–] • 4 pts

I read the sticky, the title of the post, looked at the tweet.

I see 'Here is the Face of White Privilege' post title, then see the tweet image of 2 jews. I immediately think INeverGiveUp is pointing out another example of shapeshifting jews that move through society exercising their jewish debauchery while cloaked as "Whites" - which feeds MSM to confuse the masses into believing Whites are to blame for the jewish debauchery. This seems pretty much in line with many posts I've seen here exposing jewish shapeshifting to impugn Whites.

Is there a flaw in my interpretation or have I missed a salient point of this post because I still feel the infraction does not merit the severe punishment. My 2 cents fwiw now that I have seen the 'offending' post.

[–] • 2 pts

50 lashes with a wet bagel!

[–] • 1 pt

have I missed a salient point of this post because I still feel the infraction does not merit the severe punishment.

Agree - it started with that tweet, but the tweet isn't the issue. The issue is that, repeatedly over the last six months, a consistent poster loses hundreds of points as soon as they start to get in the black.

[–] • 3 pts

Yes, I noticed soon after he was wiped back then and have made a few comments about it to him. It is much like a torture chamber, early on he gets just barely in the black and boom! -300pts. He chews his way back to near zero and boom back to -450, on and on. I've seen him down to nearly -900pts before. In the meantime, restricted capabilities when posting. POALs Penalty Point Purgatory into perpetuity. He's stuck halfway between those who get their points wiped and have to start over and those who simply get the boot. I like the guy, he's been a good poster, put a lot of time into it. He finds and has posted a lot of stuff of interest to me.

[–] • 0 pt

it started with that tweet, but the tweet isn't the issue.

Yes it is and you both got caught lying about it.

The issue is that

No, it's not, no matter how many times you'll repeat it.

a consistent poster loses hundreds of points

An anti-White liar loses hundreds of artificial upvotes from sleeper accounts created exclusively for that purpose.

So keep ignoring answers and stay in your delusional wonderland.

[–] • 0 pt

Is there a flaw in my interpretation

Yes, you fell for it.