Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

654

INeverGiveUp is a long-term and consistent contributor to this sub.

Nearly six months ago, INever posted a twitter comment without quotes - making it appear that the statement was INever's. For that error, INever's account remains in the negative and is essentially nonfunctional for anything other than posting.

Despite this awful treatment, INever has lived up to their name and continues to post without complaint.

Where is our support for INever?

If we can't stand for each other, we stand for nothing.

INeverGiveUp is a long-term and consistent contributor to this sub. Nearly six months ago, INever posted a twitter comment without quotes - making it appear that the statement was INever's. For that error, INever's account remains in the negative and is essentially nonfunctional for anything other than posting. Despite this awful treatment, INever has lived up to their name and continues to post without complaint. Where is our support for INever? **If we can't stand for each other, we stand for nothing.**

(post is archived)

[–] [Sticky] • 4 pts

INever posted a twitter comment without quotes - making it appear that the statement was INever's.

lol You want to play the drama-concern-lying-jew, I'm game.

INever posted a link to https://nitter.net/HansMahncke/status/1607560871898669057#m (archive: https://archive.ph/XCfZw)

and titled it "Here is the Face of White Privilege"

Now show me that exact same sentence in that tweet.

[–] • 4 pts

I don't get it, what exactly did he do wrong?

[–] • 3 pts

Read again until you get it.

[–] • 2 pts

He posted a link of a jew and titled it the face of white privilege?

[–] • 1 pt

It appears you are pointing out your own failure to identify and remove alt accounts.Strange how they all seem to be in this sub, upvoting . Seems a smart person, like you , could figure this out and remove the egregious rule breakers/s.

[–] • 1 pt

Maybe I'm not understanding something bc it seems if the sleepers can be identified, then they can be removed. It seems like it would be better to block the sleeper accounts than let the sleepers destroy a real user's account. It's like being sent to jail for a theft you didn't commit while the actual thieves continue to steal with abandon.

And it makes no sense that INever would be connected to the sleeper accounts - Why would someone continue using sleeper accounts to basically nuke their own account? There's absolutely no advantage to that for INever.

Strange how they all seem to be in this sub, upvoting

Good point. There have apparently been problems with that in the past, but, to my knowledge, no one else in the sub is currently being affected by sleeper accounts. Why would the sleepers be targeting only @INeverGiveUp ? INever's posts are quite similar to other posts - seems those posts would be hit as well. I can't remember a situation like INever's happening before - where someone is losing hundreds of points at a time and can never get into positive points.

Speaking of points, let's say INever starts out the day at-100 points. During the day, INever makes five posts and each of those posts gets 10 points. So at the end of the day, INever has -50 points. The next morning INever logs on and now has a score of -550 (consistent with the point differences I've witnessed happening.) So if each sleeper account could only upvote each post one time that means, on average, for the five posts, there would have to be about 100 sleeper accounts. Why would 100 sleeper accounts be so focused on INever while ignoring everyone else? I guess I'm not smart enough to understand all this complicated stuff bc it makes no sense.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

I'm not playing anything:

Perhaps I didn't explain accurately, but it was a convoluted series of tweets, as I described at the time it happened. https://pic8.co/sh/6cFkjx.png

Links to original tweets:

https://pic8.co/sh/DH8QAX.png

https://pic8.co/sh/NAreuP.png

Edit: The content of the tweets isn't what's important - it's the continual point losses making INevers account basically nonfunctional.

[–] • 4 pts

Perhaps I didn't explain accurately,

Yes you did. You just parroted what INever told you.

but it was a convoluted series of tweets, as I described at the time it happened.

No, it was not. You are now doubling down on your lies.

Read my sticky comment again, that's exactly what happened. No other tweet involved.

Treated So Terribly?

lol Another lie.

He's getting upvoted by sleeper accounts who are doing nothing but upvote his posts. So when they get noticed, their votes get cancelled and thus INever's score.

[–] • 1 pt

How is that possible?

It's not like INever's posts are averaging 40 up-votes when other posts are averaging five - INever's post scores are consistent with the scores other users' posts receive.

But let's hypothetically assume that INever gets an average of six points per post. Even if half of those votes are from sleeper accounts (which I don't believe they are,) it doesn't explain how in one day INever can go from -400 to -700 points overnight or why I Never never gets in positive points despite their consistent posting history.

[–] • 0 pt

AOU kicking ass and taking names!

[–] • 1 pt

If you don't like how users are treated by the admin of this site - fck off and start your own !! . Lmao

[–] • 3 pts

Do you not recognize your hypocrisy?

[–] • 5 pts

I've always felt @INeverGiveUp was/is an upstanding POALer who has made a significant contribution here. I've liked a lot of his posts/comments over the years. I never understood the infraction and why he was condemned to Poal's point prison into perpetuity vs simply having points wiped and starting over like many others.

Whatever the issue was, he has paid a serious price. Is there any chance for clemecy?

[–] • 3 pts

Maybe because he's a deluded q-tard ?? - that incessantly posts bull shit msm links about imaginary 'white hats' doings. 'fighting le deep state by propagating their media'...

[–] • 2 pts

Bud, that's not against the rules. Free speech means free speech

[–] • 2 pts

Here we go again with that old trope. He can take his qtard roadshow back to Tel Aviv.

[–] • 1 pt

Tell us about it iscreamtrucks

[–] • 0 pt

'Free speech is not free from consequences.....'

[–] • 1 pt

I can always count on you commenting your opinion, Dass. Like clockwork.

INeverGiveUp's recent (past year or more) posts are ~95% non-Q related material.

[–] • 1 pt

Are they bs msm article links ??

[–] • 3 pts

My thoughts exactly.

All of us, at one point or another, have been "guilty" of writing something that could have been worded better or more accurately. INever deserves the same "forgiveness" we'd appreciate receiving ourselves.

[–] • 0 pt

Enough "forgiveness". "Forgiveness" is exploited by jews to genocide Whites in their own countries.

[–] • 3 pts

Read the sticky comment.

White people have been replaced because of our empathy toward non-White.

He exposed himself with an anti-White title he wrote himself. Even though he and his patriot friends are lying about it saying it was a tweet and he forgot to quote it.

[–] • 4 pts

I read the sticky, the title of the post, looked at the tweet.

I see 'Here is the Face of White Privilege' post title, then see the tweet image of 2 jews. I immediately think INeverGiveUp is pointing out another example of shapeshifting jews that move through society exercising their jewish debauchery while cloaked as "Whites" - which feeds MSM to confuse the masses into believing Whites are to blame for the jewish debauchery. This seems pretty much in line with many posts I've seen here exposing jewish shapeshifting to impugn Whites.

Is there a flaw in my interpretation or have I missed a salient point of this post because I still feel the infraction does not merit the severe punishment. My 2 cents fwiw now that I have seen the 'offending' post.

[–] • 2 pts

50 lashes with a wet bagel!

[–] • 1 pt

have I missed a salient point of this post because I still feel the infraction does not merit the severe punishment.

Agree - it started with that tweet, but the tweet isn't the issue. The issue is that, repeatedly over the last six months, a consistent poster loses hundreds of points as soon as they start to get in the black.

[–] • 0 pt

Is there a flaw in my interpretation

Yes, you fell for it.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

White people have been replaced because of our empathy toward non-White.

Yeah, that's unfortunate but that's what it is, and there's more... We would have been crazy talibans massacring anything not just like them on their territory we would be better off, but that wouldn't have been us at the time, the story of catholicism is quite impressive in that regard... "We" did massacre anything not "just like us" on our respective territories for a long period of time actually https://youtu.be/xFIXMM1KWyc?t=6214 and it didn't provide the best results in the end, while it did provide broad unity https://youtu.be/xFIXMM1KWyc?t=3430 some 500 years earlier. Now the racial dimension of wwII plus the staggering body count associated to it, really killed the whole concept of war over race, it's been fatal for the whole idea, fatal like bud light for anheuser–busch ideologically speaking... Just like it's been for catholicisim in the end, it's the 900 pounds sandbag from the 3rd floor that broke the camel's back, too much casualties associated with the concept itself, "never again never fugget'" giving birth to new currents, galaxy of splinter ideological currents in the end and later generations got bamboozled by the victors and it's like that, too bad, now we're dealing with the sequels... It's been almost a century now but it's still a virtually unmitigated and integral part of our cultural heritage, with the very real consequences that we all know coming attached to it

He exposed himself with an anti-White title he wrote himself.

Well the renaming of the tweet isn't that much of an antiwhite statement, it can be perceived as such eventually, but not necessarily IMO, especially here where we all know it's a kike pictured in the tweet and who's promoting antiwhite rhetoric

Even though he and his patriot friends are lying about it saying it was a tweet and he forgot to quote it.

Yeah that's sus to invoke such explanation for the name of the tweet, that's for sure, when it could have simply been a "well sry that's not what I meant I wanted to point at the fact that once again yet another kike is actually the one enjoying the actual ethnic privilege and getting away with murder" instead of relying on a blatant lie, indeed... Now maybe he wanted to say quotes as in: the face of "white privilege"

[–] • 0 pt

I've always felt he was an obnoxious qtard bot, but to each their own I guess?

[–] • 1 pt

Of course you felt that way, you feel the same about anyone posting Q material. Nothing wrong with a difference of opinion.

[–] • 0 pt

Nothing wrong with a difference of opinion.

It's just a difference of opinion goyim, now put on your dildo suit and get in your gulag for violating hate speech laws.

[–] • 5 pts

I think a better question is why don't we treat all of the Qstorm people worse.

[–] • 3 pts

Q is bullshit, but free speech is free speech.

[–] • 1 pt

free speech is free speech.

Right.

[–] • 0 pt

It is. Free speech also means context. These faggots talked... they don't inspire competence in me.

[–] • 2 pts

Bud, do they need too inspire confidence in you? Not every post is going to.

[–] • 2 pts

Never thought you would so quickly ride that bandwagon.

[–] • 0 pt

Quickly? I've begged @starjello for months to be truly effective.

[–] • 1 pt

If they're for real i guess i kinda admire their optimism

[–] • 1 pt

I have no issues with him and don't downvote or ignore anyone. Ignorance rolls off of me like oil in a non stick pan.

[–] • 2 pts

How can they make numerous posts every day yet remain in the negative hundreds of points?

[–] • 1 pt

As he digs himself out of the point hole, when his negative points get anywhere near zero and boom!, -300 to -600 points are added automagically. People aren't down voting him.

[–] • 1 pt

or has he simply been giving the opportunity to repent and has simply done nothing with it but whine further. Dude defended some seriously jewish shit iirc.

[–] • 1 pt

I think there must be people who are extremely angry at anyone who posts Q stuff or still support Trump downvoting him, but I dunno. I don't downvote him personally even though I don't hold with the Q posts and Trump pisses me off but there is no one better anyway.

[–] • 3 pts

But INever's not getting down-voted. They make numerous posts on a daily basis that are up-voted - yet remain in the negative hundreds. As soon as they start getting close to being in positive points, the next you know they're back in the negative hundreds.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm not sure. I don't know how that mechanic works. Maybe he asked AOU for it as a novelty because he doesn't care.

[–] • 2 pts

It doesn't matter if INever cares or not. It' the principle of the thing - INever's consistently posting and NOT getting down-voted - yet they remain in the negative hundreds.

[–] • 1 pt

What was the Twitter comment he posted? @AOU

[–] • 0 pt

Next question?

Why I am being treated so terribly...?

LOL. <

It's a pattern guys.

Wake up. <

CUE The Shills.

[–] • 0 pt

Do you really want me to answer this here? I've been quite up front with you, and you didn't hear me.

LOL

None of this is funny. In fact, it's breaking my heart.

[–] • 0 pt

well genestealer jews have the same color skin as us? white privilege described from the jews is European privilege but any other npc minority wouldnt know the difference so its important to call out true (((white))) privilege. i dont even know this user or the drama cause Q shit is gay and gave boomers an excuse not to get out of their chairs. trust the plan. two more weeks.