How about that! on purpose so it can't be kicked to a federal court and dismissed
Also, I think the 34 counts are the 34 individual retainer payments for the same basic service. Trying to bump it up in the media, etc.
Look at any traffic citation you've ever recieved for reference. The statute is always specified. Otherwise, violation of what?
It states what they say is criminal behavior, but there should be a line in there somewhere that specifies the law that was violated, stating the reference number of the statute, that says something like, "...in violation of 18 USC 123.345" or something to that effect.
It isn't there.
There may be a fatal flaw in the indictment. The defendant has a right to know what crime(s) he is charged with. They did not give the supposed underlying crime that he supposedly was covering up with his record keeping supposed flaws.
The record-keeping issue is completely made up. Trump owns his company. He doesn't have ANY shareholders. Who was he defrauding, himself? Laughable charges.
And by the way, from an accounting perspective there is a justification "IF" he did account for the payment as legal expenses (likely he reimbursed the company anyway, so it's moot -and betting he did), because he would have have very large legal bills if he had litigated Stormy Daniels claims anyway. This is the most retarded thing I've ever heard of. They are desperate.
"Trump owns his company. He doesn't have ANY shareholders." You are exactly right.!
Another million or two from Soros will sort it...
Then again the consensus is that this is easily the weakest of the three cases Trump is facing. Maybe they just want to smear him for the primaries or try to catch him using campaign funds for legal costs, while they wait for the other two to advance.
Affirmative Action Attorneys are not the brightest bulbs on the XMas tree!
(post is archived)