Yeah OK. Like I said. Behind the curve. Now what does that say about you? She's never once made a video that was informative to people who do their own research...
She's never once made a video that was informative to people who do their own research...
More of your grandiose BS backed by nothing. You seem vehemently against a great researcher that has been ahead of the curve since 2017 and recognized by the DS which promptly deplatformed her everywhere they controlled for being the first over many sensitive targets. If you were MAGA, you would embrace anyone who gets the truth with receipts out to the normies. Instead you make up lies about them. Why is that?
She is researching already available information. Get off youtube and go read a book. She never once made a video about shit people didn't already know. Like I said... For the sleepers
For the record I don't think you know what grandiose means. I was talking about everyone who isn't a complete sheep. Use better words. Go back to whatever feminist rally you came from
One typical meaning of grandiose is bold or excessively grand, I used the word just as intended.
Like I said, I think the only reason she picked up on Jordan Peterson is because people aren't sure about where he stands recently since his recent hiatus so she put this out. Being a current discussion, yes, some parts of her research may be redundant with that from other researchers today. Show me who has uncovered the other parts, like the Edge.org - Intellectual dark web - Ralston College - DailyWire - Jordan Peterson - Matt Walsh - Michael Knowles - Andrew Claven - Ben Shapiro - Candace Owens financial/political relationships and even Steven Crowder. Who do you follow that has even mentioned Edge.org and the intellectual dark web? I'll wait.
(post is archived)