And it's also identical to the Internet Bill of Rights pushed by Q. GET IT?!
And it's also identical to the Internet Bill of Rights pushed by Q. GET IT?!
Q had a bill of rights? I missed that
Q had a bill of rights? I missed that
Yes:
605 at 2018-01-25 17:04:48 (UTC+1)
Thank you F&F! Coincidence? AT&T>No Such Agency [contract]. AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH. Internet Bill of Rights. Q
It was generally interpreted that Q was encouraging it. I always knew it was a way for them to institute digital ID and give us the illusion of having control over our data - notice that this is another example of how they think we're too stupid to notice they skip from A to C - entirely skipping "B" which is why they have any right to our data in the first place.
Yes:
>#605 at 2018-01-25 17:04:48 (UTC+1)
>Thank you F&F!
>Coincidence?
>AT&T>No Such Agency [contract].
>AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH.
>Internet Bill of Rights.
>Q
It was generally interpreted that Q was encouraging it. I always knew it was a way for them to institute digital ID and give us the illusion of having control over our data - notice that this is another example of how they think we're too stupid to notice they skip from A to C - entirely skipping "B" which is why they have any right to our data in the first place.
I read that post as at&t, goog, face trying to push the bill of rights. could be wrong though
I read that post as at&t, goog, face trying to push the bill of rights. could be wrong though
(post is archived)