WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

713

This may seem like a long-shot, but I don't think it is - not from a SC that over-turned Roe vs. Wade.

This video gives a great explanation of this case, the process, and potential outcomes - and there are many. If this goes the way it very well could, many people -both elected and government employees - will lose their jobs, at the very least.

As I wrote in another thread, I believe the speaker of the house debacle is purposely orchestrated to stall for time (and avoid convening of the House) until the SC decides this case. And I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is the new Speaker of the House, who will assume his rightful position as President when the fraudsters are booted from office.

My money's on the SC granting the petition on the 6th for a hearing in this case. After that, as Brunson states, the SC can decide the case at ANY time - even on the 6th, esp. considering its emergency status. We all know that the 6th was chosen for it's significance. We all see things are ready to erupt - I predict heavy lava flows soon - in DC and throughout the country.

This may seem like a long-shot, but I don't think it is - not from a SC that over-turned Roe vs. Wade. This video gives a great explanation of this case, the process, and potential outcomes - and there are many. If this goes the way it very well could, many people -both elected and government employees - will lose their jobs, at the very least. As I wrote in another thread, I believe the speaker of the house debacle is purposely orchestrated to stall for time (and avoid convening of the House) until the SC decides this case. And I wouldn't be surprised if Trump is the new Speaker of the House, who will assume his rightful position as President when the fraudsters are booted from office. My money's on the SC granting the petition on the 6th for a hearing in this case. After that, as Brunson states, the SC can decide the case at ANY time - even on the 6th, esp. considering its emergency status. We all know that the 6th was chosen for it's significance. We all see things are ready to erupt - I predict heavy lava flows soon - in DC and throughout the country.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts 2y

I'm all out of popcorn so I'm just sitting here with my rose colored glasses on munching on some pie in the sky and sipping a glass of hopium.

This would be a dream come true, but I am not gonna hold my breath!!!

[–] 1 pt 2y

I love pie in the sky with a little dollup of ice cream!

[–] 1 pt 2y (edited 2y)

Believe me - I get it. My hope could certainly be misplaced with this one, but there are simply too many things happening for me to dismiss it as a fluke. The date, the SOH vote fails, the timing (within the the two-year max for Trump to assume office yet still be eligible for 2024,) and the fact that this Brunson case has received little exposure.

Another thing - a little over a year ago, leftist news outlets did a brief flurry of articles on Trump becoming Speaker - That tells me they were worried about it.

A couple examples: https://www.newsweek.com/how-donald-trump-could-become-speaker-house-without-running-office-1657764and https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/08/politics/trump-house-speaker/index.html

[–] 2 pts 2y

Well, like I said, I am not going to hold my breath but I will certainly be crossing my fingers!!!

[–] 2 pts 2y

Serious question, don't you have to be a member of the House of Representatives to become Speaker of the House? DJT is not a sitting congressman, how could he be Speaker of the house?

[–] 3 pts 2y

There is no rule in the Constitution or the rules of the House that requires the Speaker to be a member of Congress - so, you do NOT have to be a member of the House - just at least 25 years of age and a US Citizen of at least seven years.

Granted, it would be unusual - but it could happen.

[–] 1 pt 2y

hmm,,, I had no idea. Thanks.

[–] 2 pts 2y

No problem - it was a good question.

Also, your Safe-T Act post is good - Geez, that thing is a mess - glad to see it's on hold. https://poal.co/s/Illinois/604797

[–] 2 pts 2y (edited 2y)

Brilliant analysis! This scenario is certainly a possibility depending on how compromised the SC really is.

[–] 0 pt 2y

This senario is certainly a possibility depending on how compromised the SC really is.

Agree - it could go the way of showing us that our last bastion of law in this country has also failed us.

Or it could sent in motion the biggest political upheaval our country has ever seen. The fact that they reversed Roe vs. Wade is a strong indicator that they will decide in Brunson's favor.

[–] 1 pt 2y

Agree! I edited my comment when I noticed "senario" instead of "scenario", was having heart palpitations...LOL.

[–] 0 pt 2y

LOL - I didn't even notice the mistake :-o

[–] 1 pt 2y

Ok, TODAY, Monday, 1/9/23, is "Pray for SCOTUS' gonads Day" right?!?!?

So far all government workers seem to be having gonad issues especially those backing down from SOH votes. Here we go! Let's go Brandon!

Please correct me if this isn't the day, and update us as soon as you know something!

Prayers for SCOTUS' 'nads...

[–] 0 pt 2y

Haven't seen anything yet. Probably yet another BS scam - so I deserve every ounce of ridicule coming my way,

[–] 1 pt 2y

It was real. SCOTUS didn't have the huevos to disrupt the cushy DC empire.

[–] 0 pt 2y

I wanted so much for something ro happen with that - We are being massively deceived that things are happening behind the scenes in our favor - at from what I can tell - I see NOTHING - just more of the same BS we've tolerated for years.

[–] 0 pt 2y
[–] 1 pt 2y

Thanks for letting us know.

[–] 0 pt 2y

Great share. Ty.

[–] 1 pt 2y

You're welcome - I had so many questions about this - and many of the alt-right news sites were publishing misleading articles that the case was already scheduled for hearing - big difference between that and Brunson's petition being approved for submission.

Greg Hunter did a great job asking the right questions to end the confusion about this case and its potential ramifications.

It's rare that I'll put myself on the line for something I'm not sure of - but this thing definitely lands in my "entirely feasible" court, and if I'm wrong, I'll deal with the anticipated ridicule.

[–] 1 pt 2y

If you're wrong, you are in good company, and there should be no ridicule!

[–] 0 pt 2y

Thanks, Cal - there are just too many other events converging for me to blow this off.

And here's the thing - at worst, the SC refuses to hear the case - at which point we know beyond the shadow of a doubt that EVERY part of our government has failed us.

[–] 1 pt 2y

We are all allowed to speculate on things especially if the information that you accumulate tends to point to new possibilites.

I was listening to Buck Sexton and Ray Travis today and started laughing when it was mentioned, I believe it was the 7th vote, that there had been ONE VOTE for TRUMP. Its a start, LOL.

[–] 0 pt 2y

Maybe Gaetz nominated Trump to get attention on it. Strange times for sure.

[–] 1 pt 2y

There will be no ridicule from me... It's hard to find hope in a never ending sea of lies... meaning, there are so many so called trusted "patriots" or "organic" sources spreading misinformation and disinformation.

[–] 0 pt 2y

It's hard to find hope in a never ending sea of lies... meaning, there are so many so called trusted "patriots" or "organic" sources spreading misinformation and disinformation.

Agree - That's been one of the hardest things for me. Something's telling me that this will happen - Gaetz voting for Trump in this latest round, and Trumps PR and Flynn retweeting it, only reinforce it. They know the SC is going to decide to hear that case - wouldn't surprise me if the decision's already written.