As far as I know it is not a crime in fact it's constitutionally expected for all challenges to electors to take place before the January 6th count. The Constitution specifically provides for that. Of time for the states to ratify all the electors that they're sending to the January 6th final electoral college count. So that is the time that any candidate who feels they were wronged or anyone who wants to reexamine the validity of the election would talk to and or lobby and or arrange or discuss or suggest a correction to the electors that are to be sent to the electoral college. Not only it wouldn't be a crime but it's literally the time period the Constitution provides for that to happen. And since the responsibility for conducting elections falls within each state in the responsibility for the state choosing the electors is left up completely to the states themselves and they may choose those electors in any way they want and don't even have to reference the popular vote within their state if you look at the constitution. Then it's completely appropriate for any candidate to approach the governor of a state or the legislators of a state and tell them they should make a correction to the electors that they are sending to the electoral college. At least that's the way I think the Constitution with its amendments about the electoral college reads