WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Jack Dorkey explains it so well.

Jack Dorkey explains it so well.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts (edited )

Well I guess that rules out the possibility that dorsey covertly teamed up with musk to take down an out of control woke twitter

The guy obviously had no problem with the overall politically motivated mass censorship agenda

[–] 1 pt

For sure - and, what's even worse, I suspect that what's happening now under the auspices of calling twitter out, is really a means of ensuring even stronger censorship in the future.

[–] 1 pt

That wouldn't surprise me one bit

Let's see... How about the New American Dialog Act? The NADA

To make sure everybody can say things now, you have to show an eID because russian bots on twitter!

[–] 1 pt

I already up-voted your comment but came back to comment.

To make sure everybody can say things now, you have to show an eID because russian bots on twitter!

You are absolutely correct. They've got a problem because where they were once fighting just us, now (especially with all the jab info coming out) the normies, including their liberal base, are questioning things. They can't afford to lose more people, and, in order for that to happen, they have to shut down any counter-narratives. Their censorship is under scrutiny - so how can they say "we're not censoring?" by requiring eID/Digital ID to access platforms - which they know many Pats won't sign onto and even if we do, we'll be branded domestic terrorists and be blocked from posting - swo then they can "we're not censoring content, we're protecting people."

At the very least, this Twitter case and the ongoing Facebook proceedings will result in creating new "task forces" and "disinformation boards" that will 100% make the censorship worse.

[–] 1 pt

Patriot, I do not trust either one.

[–] 1 pt

https://poal.co/s/conspiracy/569416/6a20d7ef-2713-4b23-966f-2f6e1f15c5b3#cmnts

Can you believe this shit?

Do you know of any rational explanation to explain this?

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Patriot, only one 1 that I am aware of and has been used in the past. Doubles.

https://www.inverse.com/article/20885-world-leaders-body-doubles-hillary-clinton

[–] 0 pt

100%

There's some real slick and shady going on.