Interesting how this article and others, like this one, https://link.usps.com/on_the_move/climbing-the-ranks-17/ describe Marshall as a "veteran" employee or "support manager."
In fact, Marshall was the USPS Diversity Development Specialist: https://pic8.co/sh/3DoiFx.png
Adrienne Marshall, executive director of the division, said Wednesday that the services will oversee “election mail strike teams” in every local and district community to address any problems that might arise. https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-united-states-presidential-election-2020-294f320df8a6ff9451888ae2778b1a06
"Election mail strike teams?" That sounds friendly. Might be the most accurate description of the Election and Government Mail Services we've seen.
As an aside, I DO appreciate that people are writing about this, but I haven't seen ONE report that correctly cited her previous work at USPS - and I, for one, believe her previous job title is relevant to her new position. Her employment history isn't hidden - took me about a minute to search and screen shoot it, and I am far from being a journalist. Why aren't journalists taking these extra steps to provide more accurate information?
Interesting how this article and others, like this one, https://link.usps.com/on_the_move/climbing-the-ranks-17/ describe Marshall as a "veteran" employee or "support manager."
In fact, Marshall was the USPS Diversity Development Specialist: https://pic8.co/sh/3DoiFx.png
>Adrienne Marshall, executive director of the division, said Wednesday that the services will oversee “election mail strike teams” in every local and district community to address any problems that might arise. https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-united-states-presidential-election-2020-294f320df8a6ff9451888ae2778b1a06
"Election mail strike teams?" That sounds friendly. Might be the most accurate description of the Election and Government Mail Services we've seen.
As an aside, I DO appreciate that people are writing about this, but I haven't seen ONE report that correctly cited her previous work at USPS - and I, for one, believe her previous job title is relevant to her new position. Her employment history isn't hidden - took me about a minute to search and screen shoot it, and I am far from being a journalist. Why aren't journalists taking these extra steps to provide more accurate information?
(post is archived)