Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

Up to 92%, not 92%.

And the largest metanalysis, to date, on ivermectin, showed a reduction of around 30%-40%. All were high quality random control trials.

We know ivermectin works. But it is not a silver bullet.

The most likely explanation for why ivermectin worked is it cleared parasites for the COVID-19 infected and allowed their systems to focus on fighting the infection and not the parasites. Almost all of those RCTs were from India, Bangladesh, or Sri Lanka - all places were parasites are much more likely. When similar studies are done in the West, we see little to no benefit. Most of the time, no benefit. Hence the theory that it is parasites.

[–] • 1 pt

I look at that as it's likely that ivermectin is more effective if the patient has sufficient C, D3 and zinc in their diet. If one is run down, the ivermectin results might not be as optimal. The healthier the patient was (pre covid) improves the ivermectin results. I've only seen HCQ studies on this.

[–] • 1 pt

Love your intelligence and contribution to the topic. I'll add that to my list of theories for why Ivermectin seems to work in 3rd world countries but not the west. Your explanation seems more likely because the "parasite" theory has some contradicting information in it. Some folks with parasites and a COVID-19 infection did not see an improvement after taking ivermectin, throwing my theory out the window. But a poorer diet lacking in essential vitamins may be the key to explaining the differences between the West and these poorer countries.

[–] • 1 pt

Well Thanks! As you can tell, I'm in the Zelenko camp on C, D3 and zinc being the fundamental nutrient foundation that makes HCQ (and proboaby ivermectin) most effective against covid.

[–] • 1 pt

They didn't recommend against ivermectin do much as they actively ran a smear campaign against ivermectin

[–] • 1 pt

Oh yeah I remember and it had the NPCs saying it's a horse dewormer. Wonder if any of them people know it's effective now and if they do realize it... do they feel stupid for parroting that talking point. I used to stick up for israel and laugh at 911 truthers. Damn I was dumb and under the jew thumb.

[–] • 1 pt

And they called aspirin sheep painkiller pill.

Oh no wait they wouldn't do that as no one was retarded enough to buy that crap like they bought horse dewormer crap.

If humanity hadn't of been so dumbed down evil wouldn't be so rampant

[–] • 1 pt

It's all been done by design and that is the most fucked up part. I can't trust the fda or any other experts, the media, our government and "the science" for that matter. Anymore it's like walking around with the (They live) shades on all the time. Some serious nefarious shit going on in the background.

[–] • 1 pt

They have dory syndrome and only remember the last 4 am talking point, not the day before's talking point.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

'Up to 92%, not 92%. And the largest metanalysis, to date, on ivermectin, showed a reduction of around 30%-40%. All were high quality random control trials. We know ivermectin works. But it is not a silver bullet. '

From - that relentlessly shilled on here for months with pages and pages of msm copy paste the Pfizzer jab was totally safe and effective, everyone should rush out and get it or 'they are literally killing grandma' (his words not mine).

For all studies (pooled effects, all stages, including studies purposely designed to produce poor results for Ivermectin)

Ivermectin 63% Against the WHO recommended -
Molnupiravir 33% Sotrovimab 17%

EDIT: 'The most likely explanation for why ivermectin worked is it cleared parasites for the COVID-19 infected and allowed their systems to focus on fighting the infection and not the parasites. Almost all of those RCTs were from India, Bangladesh, or Sri Lanka - all places were parasites are much more likely. When similar studies are done in the West, we see little to no benefit. Most of the time, no benefit. Hence the theory that it is parasites.'

Ivermectin is an ACE2 Inhibitor (protease bla bla ), a more powerful and effective to the Pharmaceutical Paxlovid. What studies exactly in the West show little to no benefit ?? - Or are these the 'Official' ones purposely designed to produce poor results (Ie, late start to treatment after onset of symptoms, low dosing, participants with pre existing comorbidities etc )

Individuals also need to maintain levels of Vit C, Vit D3, Zinc and other recommended Covid protocol supplements.

[–] • 0 pt

Most BigPharma studies I've seen leave out D3 and zinc, patients are so sick they are developing pneumonia before they enter the study, then their HCQ or Ivermectin dosages are way off from Zelenko's recommendations. Yes, the studys never exactly replicate Zelenko's recommendations and the patients are extremely sick before the trial begins. Designed to fail.

[–] • 1 pt

Yes, that seems to be the case for a shocking number of the Officially endorsed study's . Logically, not so much as a one single thing/ medication being a magic bullet but a complete life style approach for healthy living with a host of essential vitamins, minerals, antioxidants etc.

[–] • 1 pt

Neil Cavuto said it would kill you

CNN called it horse de wormer

but we are in Ukraine fighting for Democracy with your 60 billion dollars ..LOL

[–] • 0 pt

Agenda 2030 is about depopulation, not about saving lives.