WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

The British public has been distracted for the past week with non-stop news of Boris Johnson’s resignation as Prime Minister of the UK, speculation over who might replace him, and doomsday scenarios over a heatwave with temperatures comparable to a pleasant day by the pool on a holiday abroad.

But whilst the mainstream media has had the public attention focused on the above, and at the same time manipulated them into fearing for their lives over a bit of sunshine, the UK Government quietly published a report on Covid-19 deaths.

That report reveals that since the beginning of 2022, the vaccinated population have accounted for over 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths in England, and 91% of those deaths have been among the triple/quadruple vaccinated.

More at link.

The British public has been distracted for the past week with non-stop news of Boris Johnson’s resignation as Prime Minister of the UK, speculation over who might replace him, and doomsday scenarios over a heatwave with temperatures comparable to a pleasant day by the pool on a holiday abroad. But whilst the mainstream media has had the public attention focused on the above, and at the same time manipulated them into fearing for their lives over a bit of sunshine, the UK Government quietly published a report on Covid-19 deaths. That report reveals that since the beginning of 2022, the vaccinated population have accounted for over 9 in every 10 Covid-19 deaths in England, and 91% of those deaths have been among the triple/quadruple vaccinated. More at link.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

I've been saying this since most of us were on Voat:

The REAL datapoint is the deaths, not if you tested positive.

So for this result to show that 91% of people who died from COVID-19, were vaccinated, that shows a true failure of the vaccine.

Why?

The population is not vaccinated at 91%.

There are 3 scenarios:

  1. Vaccines are not effective at all and have no impact on COVID-19 deaths: If the vaccines were useless, you'd see an equal ratio of vaccinated to deaths. It would be 1 to 1.

  2. Vaccines are effective at preventing deaths: If the vaccines were effective, you'd see a ratio of fewer deaths among the vaccinated. Say, 50% of COVID-19 deaths were among the vaccinated and the vaccinated represented 65% of the population. This is a significant advantage to the vaccinated. This is not happening. It did happen in 2021 when the vaccines were fighting Alpha and Delta (these vaccines were designed for Alpha). But the primary variant is Omicron and it is significantly mutated from Alpha and Delta - it has natural immunity and vaccination resistance.

  3. Vaccines caused more deaths: And worst of all, you'd see a higher ratio of deaths among the vaccinated. 80% of the UK's population has been vaccinated. But recent figures show that 91% of the deaths are among the vaccinated. That means that the vaccines are not only NOT effective, they have a net-negative impact on the COVID-19 death rates. They are ABOVE the vaccination rate.

Number 3 is our reality. I am a data-driven person. I don't give a shit about the propaganda. Show me the data. We have the data. Now it is time for governments to put a stop to these useless and even harmful vaccines.

[–] 0 pt
  1. Vaccines were mostly not effective, or were ineffective, but most people who were unvaccinated weren't as vulnerable to the virus as those vaccinated. I think most of the elderly got vaccinated, and since they're more likely to die when they catch a disease - covid, flu, whatever - this can skew the statistics. We need stats that segregate by age to truly show an enhancement effect.
[–] 0 pt

Last year, when the MSM and government were riding the vaccine dicks, they had datapoints they could stand on to justify their positions. The unvaccinated were dying at absurd rates compared to the vaccinated. At one point, in October 2021, the data up to that point showed that 90%+ of the COVID-19 deaths were among the unvaccinated.

In addition to the immunity evasion of Omicron, I also think that the vulnerable folks - who were not vaccinated - have largely died out. Meaning, we are left with the unvaccinated folks who are healthy or who were exposed already to the virus and see no reason to get the vaccine (all data points show that people who got ill have better immunity and much longer lasting immunity than any of the vaccinated cohorts).

On Voat, I also said that vaccines could never ever be used as a long term solution. My reasoning at the time was the mutation cycle of the virus. It has a slightly longer mutation cycle than the flu viruses. So using vaccines were never a long term solution. All the data has proven me right. The mRNA vaccines were supposed to be easy to quickly churn out new batches that target new variants - in 2-3 months. Where are those vaccines? And why is natural immunity so much better than acquired immunity (vaccinated)? It shouldn't work like that when you have a robust vaccine. Seems the technology is not up to the hype. At least not yet.

[–] 0 pt (edited )

yawn

come back when you bother to mention that:

  1. Way more people are vaccinated than unvaccinated
  2. Vaccinations were the most popular amongst the older segment

.

100% of people who die in plane crashes have a passport,

"OMGerd, pAsSpOrTS kILl, wake up sheeple!!!..." etc

. . Qtards have been selling the same naff statistical BS for years now and you are still falling for it, Yes it has side effects. No, people are not dropping like flies from 5G nanobots, get over it, talk about something else...