You know exactly why calls to violence aren't tolerated.
If the targeted person in your call to violence gets actually murdered, what do you think will happen to this place? Who do you think will be legally held responsible?
You know exactly why calls to violence aren't tolerated.
I do. We just disagree that it was a call to violence.
what do you think will happen to this place? Who do you think will be responsible?
Whoever did it. And probably whatever posters they cite in their bullshit manifesto because our government is actively engaged in a propaganda war framing the entire right as violent and terrorists.
AOU you and I both know sooner or later this site, and every one like it is going to be censored and shut down over manufactured propaganda. If others can commit crimes, and blame your words for it, then none of your rights are secure, and anyone can be blamed for anything anyone else does.
I can't tell you to stand against that nonsense, because it would come at a personal cost. But I can tell you it doesn't matter that I'm a pacifist, and it doesn't matter that we obey the law, and it doesn't matter if we keep rhetoric in an even stricter standard than 'simply legal' because we're all gonna be blamed for the next horror or tragedy anyway, because thats whats always happens.
Maybe I'm just drunk, but the truth of it is we've spent twenty years being out-right demonized into political non-representation and that is always how it is going to be
Your site will go, just like the chans went, voat went, just like gab will go, just like every other alternative.
One day it will be as illegal to say "I disagree with CRT and LGBTQ being taught in school." as it supposedly is to say "I hope xyz dies".
I'm not really arguing with you here, I'm just saying whats on my mind.
One day it will be as illegal to say "I hope xyz dies"
That's not what you said.
AOU you and I both know sooner or later this site, and every one like it is going to be censored and shut down over manufactured propaganda.
They've tried and failed, over and over. Censorship will always face resistance, no matter what.
That's not what you said.
Is hoping a non-specific individual at a non-specific time in a non-specific place with a non-specific method sufficient to be a threat? God dammit, you got me rules-lawyering. I'll just leave it here, with my statement that I meant nothing by it except an expression of disdain for the guy.
They've tried and failed, over and over. Censorship will always face resistance, no matter what.
Despite the highly cynical persona, I've lost significant hope that anything will succeed. We're gonna face 70 years of bolshevism here in the u.s. AOU, same as the soviets faced.
Shit just gets worse and worse and never gets better.
(post is archived)