> That's not what you said. Is hoping a non-specific individual at a non-specific time in a non-specific place with a non-specific method sufficient to be a threat? God dammit, you got me rules-lawyering. I'll just leave it here, with my statement that I meant nothing by it except an expression of disdain for the guy. > They've tried and failed, over and over. Censorship will always face resistance, no matter what. Despite the highly cynical persona, I've lost significant hope that anything will succeed. We're gonna face 70 years of bolshevism here in the u.s. AOU, same as the soviets faced. Shit just gets worse and worse and never gets better.