WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

928

Rand Paul blocks $40B Ukraine bill (bitchute.com)

Rand Paul Blocks $40B Ukraine Aid Bill (thefiscaltimes.com)

Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) on Thursday blocked speedy Senate passage of a $40 billion aid package for Ukraine, defying leaders of both parties who urged lawmakers to approve the military and economic assistance quickly and warning that “we cannot save Ukraine by dooming the U.S. economy.”

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had called on both Republicans and Democrats “to help us pass this urgent funding bill today,” but Paul refused to allow the unanimous agreement the Senate needed to proceed to a vote on the bill. Paul wanted language inserted into the bill to have a federal watchdog oversee the Ukraine aid.

“I’m not allowing a speedy passage of the bill without having something fiscally responsible in the bill,” Paul told reporters, and in a speech on the Senate floor he criticized the additional deficit spending, warning that it fuels inflation and ignores domestic priorities. “We will have to borrow that money from China to send it to Ukraine,” he said. “With a $30 trillion debt, America can’t afford to be the world’s policeman.”

Paul rejected a deal reached by McConnell and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that reportedly would have brought the aid bill to a vote, with Paul’s language as an amendment, after lawmakers first considered a stand-alone bill from Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) to establish a special inspector general for the Ukraine aid.

“As the war in Ukraine extends into its third month, we have a moral obligation — a moral obligation — to stand with Ukraine in its fight against Putin’s immoral war,” Schumer said on the Senate floor. “The package is ready to go. The vast majority of senators on both sides of the aisle want it. There is now only one thing holding us back: The junior senator from Kentucky is preventing swift passage of Ukraine aid because he wants to add, at the last minute, his own changes directly into the bill. His change is strongly opposed by many members from both parties. He is not even asking for an amendment. He is simply saying, my way or the highway.”

Schumer later added that Paul’s remarks made it clear he doesn’t want to aid Ukraine. “All he will accomplish with his actions here today is to delay that aid, not to stop it,” Schumer said.

The bottom line: Paul “has a long history of demanding last-minute changes by holding up or threatening to delay bills on the brink of passage, including measures dealing with lynching, the defense budget and providing health care to the Sept. 11 attack first responders,” Alan Fram of the Associated Press writes.

Paul’s objection here will delay the Senate vote on the Ukraine aid package until at least next week. If the Senate ultimately makes changes to the bill, it would force the House to vote on it again before it could go to President Joe Biden’s desk, threatening to further delay funding that the Biden officials have said is needed by May 19.

[Rand Paul blocks $40B Ukraine bill](https://www.bitchute.com/video/tkpTM6kIqmBb/) [Rand Paul Blocks $40B Ukraine Aid Bill](https://www.thefiscaltimes.com/newsletter/20220512-Rand-Paul-Blocks-40B-Ukraine-Aid-Bill) Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) on Thursday blocked speedy Senate passage of a $40 billion aid package for Ukraine, defying leaders of both parties who urged lawmakers to approve the military and economic assistance quickly and warning that “we cannot save Ukraine by dooming the U.S. economy.” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had called on both Republicans and Democrats “to help us pass this urgent funding bill today,” but Paul refused to allow the unanimous agreement the Senate needed to proceed to a vote on the bill. Paul wanted language inserted into the bill to have a federal watchdog oversee the Ukraine aid. “I’m not allowing a speedy passage of the bill without having something fiscally responsible in the bill,” Paul told reporters, and in a speech on the Senate floor he criticized the additional deficit spending, warning that it fuels inflation and ignores domestic priorities. “We will have to borrow that money from China to send it to Ukraine,” he said. “With a $30 trillion debt, America can’t afford to be the world’s policeman.” Paul rejected a deal reached by McConnell and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) that reportedly would have brought the aid bill to a vote, with Paul’s language as an amendment, after lawmakers first considered a stand-alone bill from Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) to establish a special inspector general for the Ukraine aid. “As the war in Ukraine extends into its third month, we have a moral obligation — a moral obligation — to stand with Ukraine in its fight against Putin’s immoral war,” Schumer said on the Senate floor. “The package is ready to go. The vast majority of senators on both sides of the aisle want it. There is now only one thing holding us back: The junior senator from Kentucky is preventing swift passage of Ukraine aid because he wants to add, at the last minute, his own changes directly into the bill. His change is strongly opposed by many members from both parties. He is not even asking for an amendment. He is simply saying, my way or the highway.” Schumer later added that Paul’s remarks made it clear he doesn’t want to aid Ukraine. “All he will accomplish with his actions here today is to delay that aid, not to stop it,” Schumer said. The bottom line: Paul “has a long history of demanding last-minute changes by holding up or threatening to delay bills on the brink of passage, including measures dealing with lynching, the defense budget and providing health care to the Sept. 11 attack first responders,” Alan Fram of the Associated Press writes. Paul’s objection here will delay the Senate vote on the Ukraine aid package until at least next week. If the Senate ultimately makes changes to the bill, it would force the House to vote on it again before it could go to President Joe Biden’s desk, threatening to further delay funding that the Biden officials have said is needed by May 19.

(post is archived)

[–] 11 pts

Good for Ron Paul. One of the few members of the Senate who it worth anything.

[–] 10 pts

Rand paul. But yes.

[–] 6 pts

I think I'd be honored to be accidentally called by my father's name. I'm sure Rand feels the same. :)

[–] 7 pts

$40 billion could pay the $100,000.00 annual salary for 400,000 skilled American workers. And after boosting our own economy with that kind of government largesse, the IRS would get 13.3 billion dollars back in taxes.

But of course, that money is better spent on White Europeans killing other White Europeans. How else are the jews that run our governments going to exterminate the White race?

[–] 4 pts

No money should be given to Ukraine. The country's "leader" is a faggot and weak bitch.

[–] 2 pts

faggot and weak bitch aka “Jew”

[–] 4 pts

Paul’s objection here will delay the Senate vote on the Ukraine aid package until at least next week.

Too bad it will end up passing anyways.

[–] 3 pts

Fuck Ukraine. I hope Russia rams it so far up their ass that they vomit jizz.

[–] 0 pt

Glad you want to see more White on White death for globalist A instead of globalist B way to fall for the jewish ruse

[–] 3 pts

Ukraine is run by Jews, the sooner Russia conquers it the better. Sending arms there is doing nothing but stoking resentment and funding white genocide.

[–] 3 pts

I think Rand did the same to the $38B to israel back in 2018 or 2019.

[–] 2 pts

Nice, both that and this are legit and deserve some recognition.

[–] 2 pts

I remember there was kvetching in multiple israel publications.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

Oyyyyyy Veyyyy the goy hasn't paid its ransom!!

[–] 1 pt

LOL good! Thank you Rand Paul! It's disgusting that this country gives so much money away to undeserving 'people'. Zelensky just wants money to go buy another pair of fancy shoes..

[–] 1 pt

*blocked for a few days*

It will go through in the end.

[–] 1 pt

Great news, great post and great recap - THANK YOU! You're helping make Poal "great" again. ;-)

[–] 1 pt

How will our politician's family members survive?

[–] 0 pt

How will our politician's family members survive?

If we're lucky, they won't.

Load more (4 replies)