Ahsa Logos is far from the mainstream. I agree religion is a tool for control, I'm not defending nor attacking organized religion (which is a kike idea).

Its bullshit to think that the ancient people were slaughtered by and for christians. They were presented with the message and in large part converted as they worshiped the beauty and majesty of nature, and a creator of that nature as do we. When presented with christianity (early, not the later organized variants) they accepted it as the truth. Instead of rejecting it as one of their descendants, you may perhaps learn to embrace the harmony of nature and the creator. If you cannot embrace, do not lead others astray, agree to understand the lineage you descend from, they have had it as difficult in this world as we. They like us have been corrupted by the greed for power and riches, yet they learned to overcome, and to turn and dominate the kikes as will we.

True christianity was rejected by the jew when they brutally killed their messiah for naming them, and calling out their evil ways as we do. They rejected as a whole, so the message was not truly for them, though some have converted. The message and the messiah was for the rest of the world. Don't be so bitter about it, this is what aligns you with the kikes. It's the main reason they hate us and one of the keys of our perseverance and success. Why do you think they hate "colonialism"? They hate the spread of christianity as done by our people.

Even if you do reject, do not be so hasty to call out those who do not, lest you be as bad as one of the kikes who pervert this forum.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Magdalene

Ehrman states that the historical sources reveal absolutely nothing about Jesus's sexuality[316] and that there is no evidence whatsoever to support the idea that Jesus and Mary Magdalene were married or that they had any kind of sexual or romantic relationship.[316] None of the canonical gospels imply such a thing[317] and, even in the late Gnostic gospels, where Mary is shown as Jesus's closest disciple,[317] the relationship between them is not sexual.[317] The extremely late Greater Questions of Mary, which has not survived, allegedly portrayed Mary not as Jesus's wife or partner, but rather as an unwilling voyeur.[122] Ehrman says that the Essenes, a contemporary Jewish sect who shared many views with Jesus, and the apostle Paul, Jesus's later follower, both lived in unmarried celibacy,[295] so it is not unreasonable to conclude that Jesus did as well.[295]

Furthermore, according to Mark 12:25, Jesus taught that marriage would not exist at all in the coming kingdom of God.[318] Since Jesus taught that people should live as though the kingdom had already arrived, this teaching implied a life of unmarried celibacy.[319] Ehrman says that, if Jesus had been married to Mary Magdalene, the authors of the gospels would definitely have mentioned it, since they mention all his other family members, including his mother Mary, his father Joseph, his four brothers, and his at least two sisters.[320]

Maurice Casey rejects the idea of Mary Magdalene as Jesus's wife as nothing more than wild popular sensationalism.[296] Jeffrey J. Kripal writes that "the historical sources are simply too contradictory and simultaneously too silent" to make absolute declarations regarding Jesus' sexuality.[321]