It sounds like the article author expects justices to blindly rule according to the preferences of whichever political party appointed them. The author didn't have much to say about why Kavanaugh's constitutional argument was actually wrong.
Show me where in the constitution it says the president has the authority to violate anyone's constitutional rights or to engage in a politically motivated purge of the armed forces.
Yeah seriously. A constitutionalist isn't conservative or liberal. Their job isn't to support the right team, it's to uphold the constitution.
I'm no constitutional scholar, but his argument at least appears to makes sense. It seems like he's putting principle before ideology. We need more people like that.
He's putting money from Pfizer before principal. We need fewer people like that and fewer people like you.
(post is archived)