have they? i mean i've seen rand paul complain about it countless times but i've never seen him propose such a bill and then publicly advertise who voted against it. because who would? it would be very revealing, there's no counter argument against it. if you can't read the bill because it's too long how can you properly vote on it.
have they? i mean i've seen rand paul complain about it countless times but i've never seen him propose such a bill and then publicly advertise who voted against it. because who would? it would be very revealing, there's no counter argument against it. if you can't read the bill because it's too long how can you properly vote on it.
So you don't know how the sausage is made. Basically if your "team" has 51% then you get to decide what makes it to a vote, and even then we often don't know who votes how.
Just as an example, Rand has introduced "read the bill" legislation and "audit the fed" type legislation many times, as has MTG, massie, and so on; they would never-ever let it go to a recorded vote.
So you don't know how the sausage is made. Basically if your "team" has 51% then you get to decide what makes it to a vote, and even then we often don't know who votes how.
Just as an example, Rand has introduced "read the bill" legislation and "audit the fed" type legislation many times, as has MTG, massie, and so on; they would never-ever let it go to a recorded vote.
(post is archived)