WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I'm pretty sure we can both read. The difference here is I know what a lie is. "preventing the proliferation of technology, pathogens that could be used in the development of biological weapons" is just scumbag speak for bioweapons research. You think they're gonna be honest about that?

[–] 0 pt

is just scumbag speak for bioweapons research.

So they have systems in place to combat bio terrorism, and they openly talk about it and fund it, and yet you read that as "OMG, secret biowarfare..."

OK...

[–] 0 pt

It's clear you have no experience dealing with psychopaths. This is how they talk. "Preventing bioterrorism" is exactly what I would expect them to call bioweapons research. Just like they call wars "peacekeeping" or "overseas contingency operations" and call protecting criminals "law enforcement". They always play victim or defender.

Did I mention the guys working in those labs being dead? Pretend away what they were doing all you want, they're still being thrown in mass graves as we speak.

[–] 0 pt

"It's clear you have no experience dealing with psychopaths. This is how they talk. "

Ah, the good old double bluff, we shall write Super Secret Missile on the side of our Super Secret Missile so the Russians will assume it is really a chicken shed and that we were trying to fool them...

"Preventing bioterrorism" is exactly what I would expect them to call bioweapons

or it could be "Preventing bioterrorism", because you can't keep a fucking imaginary biowarfare lab secret by giving it stupid names...

.

https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/03/1114272