Elon Musk is NOT a patriot, but you're free to believe that until the only cars you're allowed to "drive" are cars that monitor everything you do and can be remotely disabled at any time. Elon Musk would be NOWHERE NEAR where he is now in terms of "success" without being funded by US TAXPAYERS.
Also, in case it isn't sufficiently obvious, the account that retweeted Musk is a Trump parody account.
I was always suspicious that he made his real money on PayPal. Anything connected to the US banking system is super suspect to me.
Absolutely - and look at where Mush and the other paypal mafia members are now: https://www.businessinsider.com/paypal-mafia-members-careers-elon-musk-peter-thiel-reid-hoffman-2019-11?op=1#linkedin-cofounder-reid-hoffman-served-on-the-board-of-directors-when-paypal-was-founded-13
And don't forget that ebay (Omidyar) owned paypal until the SEC forced them to divest it, although he still holds an interest in paypal.
can be remotely disabled at any time
Or can be made to drive into the nearest tree or lake.
Exactly. I can see where autonomous vehicles would be good for people who could not be independent without them. However, they should NEVER be a requirement. THAT's how they're going to keep us exactly where they want us.
Or blown up...
I don't think being a "patriot" and a proponent of "freeze peach" are mutually exclusive! Do you?
No - I agree they aren't the same thing.
That being said, I'm not sure Musk's motivation to maintain access to starlink is necessarily free-speech related.
I'm sorry, not meaning to give you a hard time httbmc - I like you and your comments, but I do NOT like Musk. He's a drug-abusing, satan-worshiper-dater, cartel-associating, subsidy-sucker - and if he proves otherwise, you have my absolute permission to tar and feather me for as long as we both exist :-)
I think you made it clear that you have a hard on ... or hard in..(how ever that works) for Musk. kek
If he proves otherwise to your opinion of him.. I wouldn't want to tar and feather you... maybe a good spanking though would be warranted! ;)
"That being said, I'm not sure Musk's motivation to maintain access to starlink is necessarily free-speech related. "
He (Musk) sent them to Ukraine, right? What's your thoughts about an alternative motive?
(post is archived)