Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

243

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-michael-madigan-indictment-20220302-c2mmmi2blraplceqgi6xeuu2j4-story.html

https://twitter.com/TomBevanRCP/status/1499151894178054146?cxt=HHwWhICyzY6th84pAAAA

Skimming the indictment....looks like bribery, kickbacks, extortion, the works. 50 Years in state office. Yeah, that should be a red flag.

(wondering if Gov. Pritzker is involved with this guy at all?? Madigan's daughter is the state Attorney General)

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/breaking/ct-michael-madigan-indictment-20220302-c2mmmi2blraplceqgi6xeuu2j4-story.html https://twitter.com/TomBevanRCP/status/1499151894178054146?cxt=HHwWhICyzY6th84pAAAA Skimming the indictment....looks like bribery, kickbacks, extortion, the works. 50 Years in state office. Yeah, that should be a red flag. (wondering if Gov. Pritzker is involved with this guy at all?? Madigan's daughter is the state Attorney General)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 0 pt

Here's something a little better than another damn Twitter tweet that tells you so little:

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/02/illinois-ex-house-speaker-racketeering-madigan-00013358

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, well the first link above is the actual indictment.

[–] • 0 pt

So either read the entire indictment, or just go by the little tweet?

My point was that a little more digging would provide an easier time for everybody to get the relevant parts in the indictment without them all having to waste time that you obviously didn't have because you're too busy posting as much as you can as fast as you can. You obviously don't read much of what you post either.