Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.0K

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/STN-125742_0_0-Section-2.7.3-Summary-of-Clinical-Efficacy.pdf

See page 21 of the Efficacy Study. They used the PCR test to confirm a positive COVID diagnosis. PCR was designed using common cold/flu virus because the COVID-19 virus was unavailable.

This STUDY IS USELESS. But it was used to sell you a vaxx that likely didn't work. People in the Vaxxed and Unvaxxed groups in this study may have been infected with a cold or common flu rather than COVID.

Here's the prior post about the PCR tests being developed with common cold/flu virus (NOT COVID 19)

https://poal.co/s/QStorm/504075

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/STN-125742_0_0-Section-2.7.3-Summary-of-Clinical-Efficacy.pdf See page 21 of the Efficacy Study. They used the PCR test to confirm a positive COVID diagnosis. PCR was designed using common cold/flu virus because the COVID-19 virus was unavailable. This STUDY IS USELESS. But it was used to sell you a vaxx that likely didn't work. People in the Vaxxed and Unvaxxed groups in this study may have been infected with a cold or common flu rather than COVID. Here's the prior post about the PCR tests being developed with common cold/flu virus (NOT COVID 19) https://poal.co/s/QStorm/504075

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

They also changed the definition of effectiveness. The real number, even with the fake PCR test was about 12% if memory serves.

[–] • 0 pt

Totally unrelated to covid, but there were several drug studies done than relied on the Theranos blood tests. After Theranos was proven to be a total fraud, the drugs were not removed from market.